Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8999
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br /><br />The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br /><br />Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br /><br />Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br /><br />Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br /><br />In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br /><br />The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br /><br />Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br /><br />Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8999
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br /><br />The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br /><br />Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br /><br />Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br /><br />Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br /><br />In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br /><br />The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br /><br />Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br /><br />Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67efd041e7ee6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8999,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8999
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &amp;ldquo;incentives&amp;rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &amp;ldquo;encouraging&amp;rdquo; the social crime. &amp;ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&amp;rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &amp;ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&amp;rsquo;s the simple fact.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &amp;ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &amp;ldquo;two live births&amp;rdquo; in low performing states. &amp;ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&amp;rdquo; he countered the government&amp;rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &amp;ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br /><br />The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br /><br />Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br /><br />Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br /><br />Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br /><br />In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br /><br />The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br /><br />Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br /><br />Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8999,
		'title' => 'SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br />
<br />
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br />
<br />
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br />
<br />
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br />
<br />
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br />
<br />
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br />
<br />
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9103,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8999,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Gender',
	'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br /><br />The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br /><br />Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br /><br />Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br /><br />Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br /><br />In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br /><br />The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br /><br />Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br /><br />Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8999,
	'title' => 'SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br />
<br />
The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br />
<br />
Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br />
<br />
Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br />
<br />
In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br />
<br />
Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br />
<br />
Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/SC--doubtful--of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages/821151/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-doubtful-of-sops-to-women-pregnant-from-child-marriages-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-9103',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9103,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8999
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal'
$metaKeywords = 'Gender'
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash &ldquo;incentives&rdquo; under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as &ldquo;encouraging&rdquo; the social crime. &ldquo;If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,&rdquo; a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed.<br /><br />The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19.<br /><br />Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas.<br /><br />Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, &ldquo;It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that&rsquo;s the simple fact.&rdquo;<br /><br />Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue.<br /><br />In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government &ldquo;that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women&rdquo;.<br /><br />The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care.<br /><br />Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just &ldquo;two live births&rdquo; in low performing states. &ldquo;Does this mean that the third child will not get food?&rdquo; he countered the government&rsquo;s rationale in the scheme.<br /><br />Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. &ldquo;This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC ‘doubtful’ of sops to women pregnant from child marriages by Krishnadas Rajagopal

The Supreme Court on Friday appeared doubtful about pressing the government to give cash “incentives” under a centrally sponsored scheme to poor women pregnant from child marriages, saying this may be seen as “encouraging” the social crime. “If Government of India gives incentives, will it not mean that it is encouraging child marriages.... We cannot give approval to child marriages,” a Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma observed. The observation came after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for NGO, PUCL, raised objections to how the Janani Surakha Yojana (JSY), a safe motherhood intervention scheme under the National Rural Health Mission which covers pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line, restricts cash assistance to only women aged above 19. Cash aid under the scheme ranges from Rs 1,400 to Rs 600 depending on rural and urban areas. Gonsalves, however, objected to the query from the court, saying, “It does not matter whether it was child marriage or not. A child cannot be penalised just because it was borne out of a child marriage. There is no food in the womb, that’s the simple fact.” Reconsidering its observation, the bench then asked Gonsalves to address detailed arguments on the issue. In November 2007, the Supreme Court in an order by a bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, which was then hearing the case, had directed the government “that an amount of Rs 500 per birth is irrespective of the number of children and the age of the women”. The JSY scheme, launched in 2003, is implemented with an objective to reduce maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting institutional delivery. It integrates help in the form of cash with antenatal care during pregnancy period, institutional care during delivery as well as post-partum care. Gonsalves also found fault with how the scheme limits ante-natal and post-natal cash assistance to just “two live births” in low performing states. “Does this mean that the third child will not get food?” he countered the government’s rationale in the scheme. Thirdly, the court wants to hear detailed arguments on how the scheme, in high performing states, covers a birth in a BPL family only if the delivery was in a government or accredited private health institution. “This means that there is no cash assistance to BPL families who opt for home deliveries,” he said. Responding to the submissions, the court said that there should not be any difference in maternity benefits under the scheme whether the child is born at home or hospital. Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said the JSY scheme follows the National Maternity Benefit Scheme, and was modified to specify the cut-off age of women eligible and the number of births covered for benefits.