Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...' $disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC raps govt on cola panels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /><br />The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /><br />He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...' $disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC raps govt on cola panels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /><br />The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /><br />He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047b33574a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047b33574a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...' $disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels &mdash; nine of them &mdash; with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a &ldquo;roster&rdquo; and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. &ldquo;If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: &ldquo;It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it&rsquo;s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can&rsquo;t be there.&rdquo;<br /><br />The judge further said: &ldquo;Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining &ldquo;silent&rdquo; while these &ldquo;companies were selling their products&rdquo;. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. &ldquo;What work have these panels done?&rdquo;<br /><br />He dismissed the government&rsquo;s affidavits saying such an &ldquo;elaborate exercise&rdquo; was not required. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can&rsquo;t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC raps govt on cola panels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /><br />The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /><br />He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /> <br /> The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /><br />The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /><br />He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5884, 'title' => 'SC raps govt on cola panels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /> <br /> The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /> <br /> In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /> <br /> The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /> <br /> Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /> <br /> The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /> <br /> But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /> <br /> Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /> <br /> Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /> <br /> The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /> <br /> The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /> <br /> He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /> <br /> The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 February, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110209/jsp/nation/story_13557020.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-raps-govt-on-cola-panels-5977', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5977, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC raps govt on cola panels' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts. The top court has since...' $disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.<br /><br />The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any.<br /><br />In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since.<br /><br />The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority.<br /><br />Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers.<br /><br />The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking.<br /><br />But the arguments did not impress the court.<br /><br />Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.”<br /><br />The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.”<br /><br />The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?”<br /><br />He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said.<br /><br />The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
SC raps govt on cola panels |
The Supreme Court today hauled up the government for including soft drink industry representatives on food standard panels intended to act on complaints against them and asked it to immediately reconstitute the committees with independent experts.
The top court has since 2004 been hearing a PIL filed by the NGO CPIL, which demanded that soft drink companies reveal the contents of their products, including pesticide and chemical contents, if any. In 2006, the government said it was setting up food standards panels to deal with the issue, staving off imminent court intervention. The case has been pending since. The panels were set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act by the Food Safety Authority. Today, when arguments resumed, CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan accused the government of packing the panels — nine of them — with representatives of Pepsi, Coke and other food and drink manufacturers. The government said there was a “roster” and every time a complaint was filed, a panel was constituted from within the roster to deal with it. Panel members had to give a no-conflict-of-interest undertaking. But the arguments did not impress the court. Pepsi counsel K.K. Venugopal further angered it by arguing against court intervention. “If everything was being done as per law, any intervention by the court would amount to jettisoning Parliament.” Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly, on the bench headed by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “It is the only panel which can invite reports from industry (to deal with a complaint). If it’s not independent how can it go into all this? As per Section 13(1) of the Act they have to be independent scientific experts. People from the industry can’t be there.” The judge further said: “Venugopal has said that the court should not jettison Parliament. But the government is not doing anything. It is acting contrary to the Act. The whole process is wrong. In fact, you are jettisoning Parliament.” The court chided the government for remaining “silent” while these “companies were selling their products”. The government has just been sitting on the matter and filing affidavit after affidavit since August 2008 when it set up the panel, the bench noted. “What work have these panels done?” He dismissed the government’s affidavits saying such an “elaborate exercise” was not required. “You can’t have these (industry) people on the panel. This is the law. You can’t have any of these people. The whole exercise being done by these people will have no meaning,” he said. The bench ordered the Food Safety Authority to renotify the panels to include only independent, scientific experts. |