Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 29380
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br /><br />This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br /><br />A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br /><br />Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br /><br />The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br /><br />The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br /><br />But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br /><br />The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br /><br />The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 29380
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br /><br />This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br /><br />A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br /><br />Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br /><br />The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br /><br />The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br /><br />But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br /><br />The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br /><br />The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67d393907b8c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 29380,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4677436,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 29380
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government&#039;s high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, the apex court&#039;s August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&#039;s high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC&#039;s nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen&#039;s fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br /><br />This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br /><br />A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br /><br />Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br /><br />The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br /><br />The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br /><br />But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br /><br />The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br /><br />The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 29380,
		'title' => 'SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br />
<br />
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br />
<br />
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br />
<br />
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br />
<br />
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br />
<br />
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4677436,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 29380,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br /><br />This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br /><br />A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br /><br />Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br /><br />The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br /><br />The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br /><br />But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br /><br />The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br /><br />The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 29380,
	'title' => 'SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br />
<br />
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br />
<br />
The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br />
<br />
But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br />
<br />
The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br />
<br />
The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 8 October, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-Aadhaar/articleshow/49265218.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-refuses-to-modify-order-limiting-role-of-aadhaar-dhananjay-mahapatra-4677436',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4677436,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 29380
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra'
$metaKeywords = 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,Direct Benefit Transfer,Direct Benefits Transfer,aadhaar,uid,PDS,Public Distribution System,LPG,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes.<br /><br />This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good.<br /><br />A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order.<br /><br />Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis.<br /><br />The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes.<br /><br />The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers.<br /><br />But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens.<br /><br />The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage.<br /><br />The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC refuses to modify order limiting role of Aadhaar -Dhananjay Mahapatra

-The Times of India NEW DELHI: In a big setback to the Centre, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to give a ruling on the Narendra Modi government's high-pitched and public interest-laced plea to allow citizens to voluntarily use Aadhaar cards to avail benefits under all social welfare schemes. This means, the apex court's August 11 interim order limiting the use of Aadhaar cards to access subsidy on LPG cylinders and ration under public distribution system holds good. A bench of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde and C Nagappan in its brief order said since petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar cards have been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench, it would be better that the same bench takes a decision on applications filed by the Centre and other bodies seeking modification of the August 11 order. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said the Centre would mention the issue before the chief justice on Thursday itself seeking an early decision on its applications on universal use of Aadhaar on a voluntary basis. The Centre had made an impassioned plea before the SC on Tuesday for modification of the August 11 order, saying limiting its use was violating the rights of more than 50 crore of the 90 crore Aadhaar card holders. It said people were being denied the option of a single-window Aadhaar identification mode to get benefits under various welfare schemes. The Centre's high decibel argument was followed by coordinated pleas from important institutions and statutory bodies like Reserve Bank of India, market regulator SEBI, insurance regulator IRDA, pension fund regulator and state governments - all seeking the SC's nod to use Aadhaar for establishing the identity of customers and consumers. But it was opposed by petitioners on the ground that the biometric data of citizens stored in the Aadhaar card was not secured from potential misuse by outside agencies engaged by the government, thus endangering the right to privacy of citizens. The SC had in its August 11 interim order said no one would be denied benefits under social welfare schemes for want of the 11-digit unique identification number. However, it had permitted the government to link PDS and LPG subsidies to the Aadhaar card to check possible pilferage. The three-judge bench, headed by Justice Chelameswar, had referred the petitions challenging the validity of making Aadhaar card mandatory to a five-judge bench along with the question whether it violated right to privacy of a citizen. The court also added a critical question - whether right to privacy was part of citizen's fundamental right to life - after the Centre had cited eight-judge bench decisions that right to privacy was not a fundamental right.