Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 24419
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.</p><p align="justify">Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.</p><p align="justify">Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.</p><p align="justify">Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.</p><p align="justify">An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.</p><p align="justify">The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:</p><p align="justify">* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.</p><p align="justify">* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.</p><p align="justify">The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.</p><p align="justify">Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.</p><p align="justify">The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 24419
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.</p><p align="justify">Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.</p><p align="justify">Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.</p><p align="justify">Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.</p><p align="justify">An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.</p><p align="justify">The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:</p><p align="justify">* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.</p><p align="justify">* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.</p><p align="justify">The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.</p><p align="justify">Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.</p><p align="justify">The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802e2ba08d9d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 24419,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24598,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 24419
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&amp;quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran replied: &amp;quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &amp;quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &amp;lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card&#039;, while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;He added: &amp;quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens&#039; fundamental rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Puttaswamy&#039;s petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.</p><p align="justify">Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.</p><p align="justify">Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.</p><p align="justify">Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.</p><p align="justify">An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.</p><p align="justify">The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:</p><p align="justify">* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.</p><p align="justify">* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.</p><p align="justify">The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.</p><p align="justify">Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.</p><p align="justify">The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 24419,
		'title' => 'SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
</p>
<p align="justify">
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
</p>
<p align="justify">
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
</p>
<p align="justify">
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 24598,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 24419,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.</p><p align="justify">Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.</p><p align="justify">Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.</p><p align="justify">Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.</p><p align="justify">An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.</p><p align="justify">The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:</p><p align="justify">* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.</p><p align="justify">* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.</p><p align="justify">The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.</p><p align="justify">Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.</p><p align="justify">The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 24419,
	'title' => 'SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.
</p>
<p align="justify">
An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:
</p>
<p align="justify">
* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.
</p>
<p align="justify">
* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 March, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140325/jsp/frontpage/story_18115275.jsp#.UzHQLmdvXoM',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-sets-limits-on-aadhaar-sweep-24598',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 24598,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 24419
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep'
$metaKeywords = 'Governance,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.


Solicitor-general Mohan...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately.</p><p align="justify">Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn.</p><p align="justify">Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?&quot; the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries.</p><p align="justify">Parasaran replied: &quot;I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: &quot;I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, &lsquo;My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added: &quot;You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty.</p><p align="justify">An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions.</p><p align="justify">The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions:</p><p align="justify">* The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned.</p><p align="justify">* No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing has been listed after four weeks.</p><p align="justify">The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights.</p><p align="justify">Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde.</p><p align="justify">The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC sets limits on Aadhaar sweep

-The Telegraph New Delhi: Allegations that the government was denying services like marriage registration and property sales to people lacking Aadhaar cards today annoyed the Supreme Court, which ordered that any notification making the scheme mandatory must be withdrawn immediately. Solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran assured the court that if any such notification had indeed been issued, it would be withdrawn. Official sources told The Telegraph that no such notification had been issued and that the official website of the Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai), which handles the Aadhaar programme, clearly states that the scheme is voluntary. "We had earlier passed an order; why are you not implementing it?" the court said referring to an interim order of September 23 last year that had ruled that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory for extending welfare schemes to eligible beneficiaries. Parasaran replied: "I will ensure that fresh instructions are issued for compliance of the order." Earlier, Justice B.S. Chauhan, heading a two-judge bench, had told Parasaran: "I have received a number of letters stating that you are insisting upon Aadhaar cards for providing certain services. In one case, one lady said, ‘My marriage is not being registered for not providing Aadhaar card', while some say properties are not being registered if there are no Aadhaar cards." He added: "You issue instructions withdrawing the notification making the Aadhaar card mandatory for availing the schemes." The bench passed the order while restraining the Uidai from sharing any Aadhaar-related data with any investigating agency and staying a recent Bombay High Court order. The high court had asked the Uidai to share with the CBI certain details of a group of Aadhaar cardholders who are suspects in a Pune rape to help the agency catch the guilty. An aggrieved Uidai had approached the apex court complaining that such an order would encourage all investigating agencies to seek similar data from it, increasing its workload beyond manageable proportions. The bench, which also comprised Justice J. Chelameshwar, passed the following directions: * The Uidai is restrained from transferring Aadhaar-related data to any agency or department without the express consent of the person concerned. * No one should be deprived of any service for not possessing Aadhaar cards if they are otherwise eligible for such services. The next hearing has been listed after four weeks. The September 23 interim judgment came on a public interest litigation filed by a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Puttaswamy, alleging the Aadhaar scheme had been launched without statutory backing and violated citizens' fundamental rights. Puttaswamy's petition also raises privacy concerns. It is being heard by the three-judge bench of Justices Chauhan, Chelameshwar and S.A. Bobde. The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to quash the petition on the ground that the Aadhaar card was sought to be used as a national identity card although it had not been made mandatory.