Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr683950697c696-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 3371
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr683950697c696-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 3371
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr683950697c696-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr683950697c696-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr683950697c696-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 3371,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 3459,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 3371
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &amp;ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&amp;rdquo; without following due process was akin to &amp;ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&amp;rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &amp;ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&amp;rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&amp;ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&amp;hellip;. Half of the compensation&amp;hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&amp;rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &amp;ldquo;What are we up to?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &amp;ldquo;summarily&amp;rdquo;. Such an approach was &amp;ldquo;perverse&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;absolutely unjust&amp;rdquo;, he said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &amp;ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;objection&amp;rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&amp;rsquo;s own policy.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 3371,
		'title' => 'SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 3459,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 3371,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...',
	'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 3371,
	'title' => 'SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 September, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100921/jsp/nation/story_12961922.jsp',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-terror-tag-on-land-rush-3459',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 3459,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 3371
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '




The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.


Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their &ldquo;land, livelihood and way of life&rdquo; without following due process was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism&rdquo;.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government&rsquo;s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh&rsquo;s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away&hellip;. Half of the compensation&hellip; is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),&rdquo; Justice Singhvi observed caustically. &ldquo;What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case &ldquo;summarily&rdquo;. Such an approach was &ldquo;perverse&rdquo; and &ldquo;absolutely unjust&rdquo;, he said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: &ldquo;What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners&rsquo; &ldquo;objection&rdquo; clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state&rsquo;s own policy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC ‘terror’ tag on land rush

The Supreme Court today held that any land acquisition depriving farmers of their “land, livelihood and way of life” without following due process was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism”. Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government’s land acquisition process, a two-judge bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi observed: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism.” The top court was hearing an appeal by some Noida villagers against a December 2008 Allahabad High Court decision upholding the acquisition of their land in Uttar Pradesh’s Gautambudh Nagar district without giving them a chance to register objections. “Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away…. Half of the compensation… is also taken away by the black coats (lawyers),” Justice Singhvi observed caustically. “What are we up to?” He also apportioned a part of the blame to the judiciary saying the high court should have heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case “summarily”. Such an approach was “perverse” and “absolutely unjust”, he said. When Shail Dwivedi, the additional advocate-general defending the state, said the landowners were willing to settle the matter, he said: “What is the choice in face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is (this) the way to exercise powers (under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act)?” Section 17(4) allows a state government to dispense with a provision allowing the owner of land sought to be acquired to file an objection to persuade the state not to acquire it. The villagers had lost their land to planned development of Noida. The state had dispensed with the landowners’ “objection” clause, mandatory under Section 5-A, on the ground of urgency. The villagers moved the high court saying the state had no material to show the acquisition was urgent. They claimed it was land on which they had built houses 40 years ago and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the state’s own policy. Their lawyers argued that the land of tenure-holders could not be forcibly taken by the state without giving them a hearing unless material was available to justify it. But the court dismissed the plea saying they would have to prove the state did not apply its mind before waiving the objection clause. It said after 17 years of acquisition there was nothing to show that the state had a policy of not acquiring residential land.