Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19159, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19159 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />"The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19159, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19159 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />"The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68286a6a0ca3c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19159, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> &quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> &quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19159 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />&quot;We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala,&quot; the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />&quot;The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution,&quot; the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />"The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> "We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> "The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19159, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />"The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19159, 'title' => 'SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /> <br /> A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /> <br /> The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /> <br /> The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /> <br /> "We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.<br /> <br /> The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /> <br /> The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /> <br /> The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /> <br /> The petition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed by the apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /> <br /> Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /> <br /> The Fali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /> <br /> The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /> <br /> "The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /> <br /> The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 February, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=789233', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sc-to-examine-non-compliance-of-its-guidelines-on-strikes-19294', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 19294, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19159 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook<br /><br />The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property.<br /><br />A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.<br /><br />The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.<br /><br />The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.<br /><br />"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing.<br /><br />The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material.<br /><br />The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.<br /><br />ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.<br /><br />Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation.<br /><br />Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.<br /><br />TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard.<br /><br />The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines.<br /><br />"The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said.<br /><br />The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
SC to Examine Non-Compliance of Its Guidelines on Strikes |
-Outlook
The Supreme Court today decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and others which have in many cases resulted in destruction of public and private property. A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Kheharissued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought theirresponses on the allegation that the apex court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented. The bench, while granting them eight weeks time, also directed them to file status reports explaining as to the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'. The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala. "We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to giveinformation regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in thenext hearing. The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states but they were not given the material. The PIL submitted that there were wilful and deliberate omission on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the apex court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties. ThePIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases. Thepetition referred to the recommendations of two committees appointed bythe apex court on the issue and to which the court had given green signal for immediate implementation. Justice (retd) K T Thomas committee had made recommendations relating to the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. TheFali S Nariman committee had also made recommendations that have to be followed in the absence of legislation in this regard. The petitioner submitted that three years have passed but neither the state governments nor the Centre have taken any action to put in place legislation or any fast-track mechanism has been created which is consistent with the guidelines. "The states are not taking any positive steps to follow or implement the guidelines issued by this court which ultimately results in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution," the PIL said. The petition also said that these guidelines are to be followed by government authorities to prevent destruction of public and private properties during demonstrations, 'bandhs', 'hartals' called by political parties and other organisations. |