Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7753
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br /><br />With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br /><br />While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br /><br />Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7753
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br /><br />With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br /><br />While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br /><br />Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f800288a54c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f800288a54c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7753,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7852,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7753
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don&#039;t seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The first-ever comprehensive review of India&#039;s anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &amp;mdash; more rigorous external targeting &amp;mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br /><br />With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br /><br />While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br /><br />Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 7753,
		'title' => 'Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br />
<br />
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br />
<br />
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br />
<br />
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br />
<br />
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br />
<br />
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 7852,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 7753,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,Poverty',
	'metaDesc' => '
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br /><br />With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br /><br />While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br /><br />Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 7753,
	'title' => 'Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br />
<br />
The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br />
<br />
With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br />
<br />
The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br />
<br />
While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br />
<br />
Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 19 May, 2011, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-05-19/india/29559537_1_schemes-centrally-sponsored-bpl-census',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'schemes-that-dont-seek-to-identify-poor-cover-them-best-by-rukmini-shrinivasan-7852',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 7852,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 7753
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS,Poverty'
$metaDesc = '
The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite &mdash; more rigorous external targeting &mdash; ahead of the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission.<br /><br />With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census.<br /><br />The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher.<br /><br />While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor.<br /><br />Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Schemes that don't seek to identify poor cover them best by Rukmini Shrinivasan

The first-ever comprehensive review of India's anti-poverty schemes has found that schemes like the MGNREGS that do not specifically seek to identify the poor are most successful in actually covering them. This is a significant finding given that many in the government have been arguing for the opposite — more rigorous external targeting — ahead of the 2011 BPL census. The World Bank on Wednesday released a review of centrally-sponsored social security schemes, including the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, the Public Distribution System, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, Indira Awas Yojana and Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. The review was commissioned by the Planning Commission. With regards to targeting, the World Bank report finds serious problems with the current BPL measure: over a third of the poorest 10% of the country were incorrectly identified as non-poor in the 2002 BPL census. This under-coverage rises to over a half and close to two-thirds for the poorest 20% and poorest 30%, respectively. The report also points to serious problems in the methodology proposed for the 2011 BPL census. The schemes with the best coverage of the poorest 20%, on the other hand, are the MGNREGS, as well as the Annapurna grain scheme and the widow pension scheme. The proportion of SC and ST households in these schemes is also much higher. While the MGNREGS is not restricted to poor families, the low wage rate and high opportunity costs ensure that there is self-selection, in other words that those not intended to be the beneficiaries are not attracted to it. The Annapurna scheme and the widow pension scheme are restricted to the elderly and widows respectively, groups that are likely to include many poor people. The result, as data compiled by the Bank shows, is that these schemes have the greatest success in covering the genuinely poor. Overall, the review finds large inter-state differences in spending and outcomes in anti-poverty schemes. Even though the poorest states are allotted the highest proportions of central funds, they have the lowest administrative capacity to spend the funds effectively.