Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7992, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7992 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC' $metaKeywords = 'Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify"> </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7992, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7992 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC' $metaKeywords = 'Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify"> </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f74acc229d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f74acc229d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7992, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7992 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC' $metaKeywords = 'Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) &mdash;likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota &mdash; have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify"> </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7992, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify"> </div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7992, 'title' => 'SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /> <br /> The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /> <br /> <em>Reports with malice<br /> </em><br /> The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /> <br /> It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /> <br /> The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div> <div align="justify"> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 1 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/SC/ST-officials-cant-write-ACRs-of-juniors-HC/articleshow/8672820.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'scst-officials-cant-write-acrs-of-juniors-hc-8092', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8092, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7992 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC' $metaKeywords = 'Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates.<br /><br />The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees.<br /><br /><em>Reports with malice<br /></em><br />The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court.<br /><br />It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006.<br /><br />The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. </div><div align="justify"> </div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
SC/ST officials can't write ACRs of juniors: HC |
-The Times of India State government officers belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) —likely to be reverted in light of a Supreme Court order that disapproved of their promotions on basis of quota — have been temporarily debarred by the Rajasthan high court from writing the annual confidential reports of their subordinates. The order came on a bunch of petitions filed by one Rajeev Garg of the state public works department and others.The petitions were based on a Supreme Court order of December 7, 2010 that conditionally denied the benefit of reservation in promotions to state government SC/ST employees. Reports with malice The SC had last year upheld a Rajasthan HC order striking down the state government's notifications to grant reservation in promotions and consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, a bunch of petitioners informed the Rajasthan high court. It was argued before the single bench of justice M N Bhandari that the February 5, 2010 HC order categorically held that no reservation was permissible in promotions in the state services since the Rajasthan government had failed to fulfill the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in the M Nagraj Case judgment on the Constitutional provision of reservation in promotions in October 2006. The HC also struck down the state government's notifications of December 28, 2002 and April 25, 2008. The state government then filed a special leave petition against the HC order, but SC dismissed the government appeal on December 7, 2010. The petitioners argued that the reserved category officials who had been promoted before December 7, 2010 in the PWD and other departments were now due to be reverted. |