Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680061d577766-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 388, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 388 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680061d577766-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 388, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 388 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680061d577766-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680061d577766-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680061d577766-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 388, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 388 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women&rsquo;s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath&rsquo;s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister&rsquo;s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to &ldquo;appropriate disciplinary action&rdquo; taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused &ldquo;where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law&rdquo;. The IPC punishes &ldquo;outraging the modesty&rdquo; of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and &ldquo;gestures&rdquo; and &ldquo;acts&rdquo; (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 388, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 388, 'title' => 'Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2009, http://telegraphindia.com/1091118/jsp/frontpage/story_11753607.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sexual-abuse-law-faces-delay-by-charu-sudan-kasturi-456', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 456, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 388 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval. Tirath has asked the ministry to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath has ordered her ministry to initiate fresh consultations on a proposed law criminalising sexual harassment at the workplace, effectively delaying further a bill ready for cabinet approval.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509).</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution.</font> </p><p align="justify"><font >The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Sexual abuse law faces delay by Charu Sudan Kasturi |
Tirath has asked the ministry to hold fresh consultations with women’s rights groups and lawyers who have raised concerns that the bill does not adequately protect victims of sexual harassment, The Telegraph has learnt. The minister’s order effectively signals a fresh review of the Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, first drafted in 2007 and promised by the Congress ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. The review, however, comes after several rounds of consultations already held with activists, lawyers and other stakeholders under Tirath’s predecessor Renuka Chowdhury. The minister’s move coincides with a stage in the bureaucratic flow of the bill when a fresh review could send the proposed legislation once again to the start of the procedural pipeline. The bill has been vetted by the law ministry, and the women and child ministry was planning to approach the cabinet for its approval -- following which it can be tabled in Parliament. But any changes to the draft bill now -- as a consequence of the suggestions made during the consultations -- will mean that the proposed legislation will need to once again be circulated to all ministries for their comments. The law ministry too will need to vet the draft bill again. The Supreme Court had laid down in 1997 a set of guidelines that all private and public firms must follow to tackle sexual harassment. For the first time in India, the order defined sexual harassment -- including showing pornography, seeking sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks. A complaint mechanism and a grievance redress framework that each public or private office must follow were also laid down. But in prescribing penalties, the order restricted its ambit to “appropriate disciplinary action” taken under service rules. Criminal proceedings, the order said, can be initiated against the accused “where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law”. The IPC punishes “outraging the modesty” of women through both physical assault (Section 354) and “gestures” and “acts” (Section 509). But it does not specify what gestures and acts comprise a crime and, most crucially does not take into account the specific nature of workplace relationships. Most complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace involve a complainant who is junior to the accused in the office hierarchy and are commonly of the nature of a superior seeking sexual favours -- subtly or explicitly. Indirect or subtle demands for sexual favours have proved next to impossible to establish under the IPC -- particularly in the absence of any law safeguarding an employee against retribution for complaining. The Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill was proposed in early 2007 to put in place a law -- referred to in the Vishakha judgement -- protecting women complainants from any retribution. The bill also aims to specifically define sexual harassment to include gestures and acts that are rarely considered under the ambit of Section 509 of the IPC. |