Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16027, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16027 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16027, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16027 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680512fd50f3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16027, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16027 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp; The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's &quot;special powers&quot;, which allows the government to acquire land, &quot;for the defence of India or national security...&quot;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..." </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16027, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16027, 'title' => 'SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..." </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 July, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh/articleshow/14793640.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sezs-will-need-to-meet-land-acquisition-bill-norms-jairam-ramesh-16155', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16155, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16027 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,land acquisition and rehabilitation,special economic zones,SEZs' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
SEZs will need to meet Land Acquisition Bill norms: Jairam Ramesh |
-The Economic Times Special Economic Zones will need to fulfill provisions of the proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, if the rural development ministry has its way. The draft bill, currently being circulated for inter-ministerial consultation, does not exempt land acquired under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, from adhering to the acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the proposed legislation. Acquisition under 13 Central Acts will remain outside the purview of the proposed legislation. The Cabinet is expected to take up the bill for consideration by the end of the month, in time for its introduction in the monsoon session. The land acquisition bill introduced in Parliament last year exempted land acquired under 16 central Acts from its provisions (clause 98). The exempted Acts, listed in the bill's fourth schedule, included the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Works of Defence Act, 1903, and Cantonments Act, 2006, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Railways Act, 1989. The Parliamentary Standing Committee had suggested that clause 98 be dropped. The committee was of the unanimous view that the exemption should not be permitted as most of the land acquisition takes place in the mining, power and other infrastructure sectors, and as such all these acquisitions would find exemption under one or the other legislations listed in the fourth schedule. Keeping land acquisition under these 16 Acts out of the purview of the bill would mean that the proposed bill will be applicable to just about 5% of land acquisition. Earlier, rural development minister Jairam Ramesh had said that he was in susbtantial agreement with the standing committee's recommendation that these 16 central acts should have resettlement and rehabilitation provisions in line with the LARR bill. However, in the redrafting, the ministry has sought to retain the exemption for 13 Acts. The withdrawal of the exemption for two defence-related legislations would not present much of a hardship. In its deposition to the standing committee, the defence ministry made it clear that it did not seek exemption from the provisions of the bill and that it would undertake all compensatory provisions. Land for defence can be acquired under the bill's "special powers", which allows the government to acquire land, "for the defence of India or national security..."
|