Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14688, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law', 'metaDesc' => ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14688 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law' $metaDesc = ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /><br />“In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14688, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law', 'metaDesc' => ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14688 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law' $metaDesc = ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /><br />“In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de9d86ff5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14688, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law', 'metaDesc' => ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14688 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law' $metaDesc = ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General&rsquo;s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that &ldquo;the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.&rdquo;<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP&rsquo;s comments, the division bench observed that the &ldquo;court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. &ldquo;It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,&rdquo; the bench said, adding that the ADGP&rsquo;s affidavit &ldquo;does not deserve to be taken on record.&rdquo;<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /><br />“In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /> <br /> “In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14688, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law', 'metaDesc' => ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /><br />“In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14688, 'title' => 'Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Express News Service<br /> <br /> The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /> <br /> The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /> <br /> Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /> <br /> Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /> <br /> Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /> <br /> “In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /> <br /> It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /> <br /> Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 28 April, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel/942489/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'shielding-whistle-blowers-punjab-gives-teeth-to-panel-14812', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14812, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14688 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law' $metaDesc = ' -Express News Service The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security.<br /><br />The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab.<br /><br />Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers.<br /><br />Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.”<br /><br />Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.”<br /><br />“In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said.<br /><br />It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.”<br /><br />Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Shielding whistle blowers: Punjab gives teeth to panel |
-Express News Service
The Punjab government has decided to include representatives of Home Department, Advocate General’s office and some social activists, including women, as members of the security review committee for grant of protection to whistle blowers. The committee would be headed by the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Security. The state submitted this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court through an affidavit filed by Surinder Pal Singh, SSP Security during the resumed hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by RTI activist and lawyer H C Arora. Meanwhile, Haryana government drew flak from the court for not taking same steps as Punjab. Earlier, while hearing the arguments in the case on December 8, 2011, the High Court had directed the two states to consider including the representatives of AG office and social activists in the panel that assesses the threat perception to the whistle blowers. Submitting its reply, the Haryana law officer produced an affidavit by ADGP (Law and Order) B S Sandhu. Referring to the earlier order of HC, the ADGP , in a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, stated that “the policy has already been finalised by the government after detailed deliberations. The purpose of inclusion of district attorney/accountant general in the committee is not clear. We may have faith in the police machinery particularly when the responsibility of providing security to all other classes of persons is vested in the police officers. At the same time inclusion of NGOs is not needed.” Taking a serious note of the ADGP’s comments, the division bench observed that the “court had expressed its provisional view that the forums which have to consider the requests for granting protection to RTI Activists should be broad based.” “In other words, confining the entire machinery for protection in the hands of the police officers was not conducive. The ADGP has made observations, which are not in consonance with the suggestions given by this court,” the Bench said. It also came down on Haryana government for letting the ADGP file the affidavit. “It was required to be filed through Chief Secretary. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary to file his affidavit within two weeks,” the bench said, adding that the ADGP’s affidavit “does not deserve to be taken on record.” Earlier, on being pointed out by the petitioner that the respondents have not stated any thing in their respective affidavits about formation of district level committees, in terms of order dated December 8, 2011, by including district attorneys, social activists and women in such committees, the Bench directed Punjab and Haryana to frame guidelines for setting up such committees at district and lower levels also. |