Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9438
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br /></em><br />The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br /><br />West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br /><br />Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br /><br />Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br /></em><br />Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br /><br />He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br /><br />He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br /><br />Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9438
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br /></em><br />The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br /><br />West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br /><br />Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br /><br />Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br /></em><br />Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br /><br />He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br /><br />He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br /><br />Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680521484a1a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680521484a1a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9438,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9547,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9438
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;West Bengal&#039;s Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government&#039;s panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from presenting the State&#039;s point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &amp;ldquo;within a matter of hours&amp;rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &amp;ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&amp;rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;No Presidential nod&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &amp;ldquo;unwilling farmers,&amp;rdquo; benefited certain individuals &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Arbitrary concept&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &amp;ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&amp;rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &amp;ldquo;undue haste&amp;rdquo; in taking &amp;ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&amp;rdquo; of the land at Singur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br /></em><br />The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br /><br />West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br /><br />Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br /><br />Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br /></em><br />Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br /><br />He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br /><br />He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br /><br />Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 9438,
		'title' => 'Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
<em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br />
</em><br />
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br />
<br />
West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br />
<br />
Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br />
<br />
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br />
</em><br />
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br />
<br />
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br />
<br />
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br />
<br />
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br />
<br />
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br />
<br />
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9547,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 9438,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br /></em><br />The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br /><br />West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br /><br />Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br /><br />Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br /></em><br />Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br /><br />He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br /><br />He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br /><br />Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 9438,
	'title' => 'Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
<em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br />
</em><br />
The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br />
<br />
West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br />
<br />
Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br />
<br />
Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br />
</em><br />
Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br />
<br />
Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br />
<br />
Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br />
<br />
He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br />
<br />
He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br />
<br />
Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 August, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2362824.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'singur-case-west-bengal-to-begin-arguments-today-by-ananya-dutta-9547',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9547,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 9438
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law

The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law<br /></em><br />The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.<br /><br />West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel.<br /><br />Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land &ldquo;within a matter of hours&rdquo; after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect.<br /><br />Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for &ldquo;nothing else but acquisition&rdquo; as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation.<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;No Presidential nod'<br /></em><br />Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid.<br /><br />Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; &ndash; a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to &ldquo;unwilling farmers,&rdquo; benefited certain individuals &ndash; &ldquo;those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Arbitrary concept'</em><br /><br />He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an &ldquo;absurd and arbitrary concept,&rdquo; which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.<br /><br />He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined.<br /><br />Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in &ldquo;undue haste&rdquo; in taking &ldquo;wrongful and forcible possession&rdquo; of the land at Singur. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Singur case: West Bengal to begin arguments today by Ananya Dutta

On petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur law The West Bengal government will commence its arguments on the petition filed by Tata Motors challenging the Constitutional validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 before the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday. West Bengal's Advocate General Anindya Mitra will begin his submissions before Justice I. P. Mukerji followed by other counsel on the government's panel. Apart from presenting the State's point of view, the panel is also expected to address queries raised by Justice Mukerji, including whether provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be read into the Act and why the government took possession of the land “within a matter of hours” after Industries Minister Partha Chatterjee had announced that it had come into effect. Samaraditya Pal, counsel for Tata Motors, said here on Tuesday that the Act was legislated for “nothing else but acquisition” as was evident in its provisions regarding vesting the land with the State, restoring possession and compensation. ‘No Presidential nod' Mr. Pal emphasised that the Act was void because it dealt with acquisition, a matter that appears in the concurrent list of the Constitution and its provisions were repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The assent from the President, which is required when a State law contravenes a Central law on a matter that appears in the concurrent list, had not been obtained. Mr. Samaraditya Pal had begun his submissions before Justice Mukerji on July 28 after Justice Soumitra Pal, who had heard the case till then, recused himself. Over the past three weeks, he has challenged both the Constitutional validity of the Act as well as the actions taken by the government even if the Act was considered valid. Mr. Samaraditya Pal has argued that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 was not legislated for a “public purpose” – a prerequisite for acquisition. He claimed that the Act, which empowered the government to take over the land of the now relocated Tata Nano small car factory in Singur to return a portion of it to “unwilling farmers,” benefited certain individuals – “those persons who had supported the party [the Trinamool Congress] in the elections.” ‘Arbitrary concept' He had also argued that the distinction made between willing and unwilling farmers in the Act was based on an “absurd and arbitrary concept,” which was not recognised and was in fact in violation of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. He also emphasised that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 did not specify the amount of compensation or the principles under which the compensation is to be determined. Providing a detailed account of the developments of June 21, 22 and 23, he said the government had acted in “undue haste” in taking “wrongful and forcible possession” of the land at Singur.