Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 526, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 526 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Singur echo in land blow to Ambani</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 526, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 526 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Singur echo in land blow to Ambani</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680eca318ce73-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680eca318ce73-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 526, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 526 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani&rsquo;s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world&rsquo;s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become &ldquo;impermissible&rdquo; because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had &ldquo;never decided to acquire any land for a power project&rdquo;. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,&rdquo; the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn&rsquo;t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take&hellip;requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,&rdquo; the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: &ldquo;We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh&rsquo;s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Singur echo in land blow to Ambani</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 526, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 526, 'title' => 'Singur echo in land blow to Ambani', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2009, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1091205/jsp/frontpage/story_11824726.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'singur-echo-in-land-blow-to-ambani-597', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 597, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 526 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur echo in land blow to Ambani' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Allahabad High Court today partly quashed the acquisition of 2,500 acres for Anil Ambani’s jinxed Dadri power project, rekindling memories of the Singur dispute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Singur echo in land blow to Ambani |
A high court division bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Sudhir Agarwal quashed the land purchase by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2004 under emergency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. The court noted that the state government had failed to record the objections of the farmers who had been opposing the forcible buyout. Although the Singur land dispute did not make it to court, the similarity is hard to miss. The land had been acquired for a 7,480MW project, which the Anil Ambani group has flagged as the world’s largest gas-fired power project at a single location, when Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party was the chief minister. The verdict is being seen as a big victory for the late Prime Minister V.P. Singh who had rallied farmers in Ghaziabad in 2006 to protest against the land acquisition. The farmers had been paid about Rs 150 per square yard for fertile agricultural land. Now, the court has directed the collector of Ghaziabad to record the complaints of the affected farmers, investigate their allegations of land acquisition under duress and hand back the land to the farmers after recovering the compensation they had received. The judges said the land acquisition had become “impermissible” because the state government had invoked section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which confers the right on the authorities to acquire land for a public purpose under emergency provisions. At Singur, land had been acquired under a similar act. They noted that the state had “never decided to acquire any land for a power project”. The notifications for the acquisition of land were based on a proposal submitted by Reliance Delhi Power Pvt Ltd, an Anil Ambani group company. “Thus, the acquisition in question cannot be termed acquisition for public purpose,” the court said. The Anil Ambani camp drew comfort from the fact that the court had permittedland acquisition under section 4 of the Act, which entails a public notification of the intention to acquire the land followed by an enquiry into objections, if any. Sources said only 500 farmers were opposing the land purchase while more than 5,000 had already received compensation, again a mirror image of Singur. They didn’t expect the farmers who had already accepted payment to return the amount. They were emphatic that the court order would not mean that the project would have to start from scratch. “We are confident that the state government of Uttar Pradesh will take…requisite steps for land acquisition...to enable the implementation of the project,” the company said in a terse statement. Supreme Court advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, who represented a section of the farmers, said: “We wanted to avoid a Singur-like situation as the farmers were willing to give up their life for the land. “The court has taken note of the argument that agricultural land is a precious resource and it is not advisable to divert it for non-agricultural purposes.” The Dadri project is central to the battle between the Ambani brothers over the supply of gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin. The latest setback for Anil Ambani comes at a time the Supreme Court is in the final stages of hearing the dispute over pricing the gas elder brother Mukesh’s company is to supply. |