Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8235
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br /><br />&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br /><br />For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br /><br />The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br /><br />Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br /><br />The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br /><br />The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br /><br />The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br /><br />The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br /><br />&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br /><br />&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br /><br />State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8235
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br /><br />&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br /><br />For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br /><br />The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br /><br />Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br /><br />The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br /><br />The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br /><br />The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br /><br />The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br /><br />&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br /><br />&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br /><br />State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806a6cb08078-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8235,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8336,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8235
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&amp;quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &amp;quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &amp;quot;recess of legislature&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday&#039;s announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The chief minister&#039;s announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee&#039;s haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The incident of the &#039;withdrawn&#039; ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &amp;quot;compensation&amp;quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&amp;quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee&#039;s announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&amp;quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &amp;quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president&#039;s consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &amp;quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&amp;quot; . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br /><br />&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br /><br />For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br /><br />The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br /><br />Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br /><br />The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br /><br />The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br /><br />The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br /><br />The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br /><br />&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br /><br />&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br /><br />State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8235,
		'title' => 'Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br />
<br />
&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br />
<br />
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br />
<br />
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br />
<br />
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br />
<br />
The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br />
<br />
The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br />
<br />
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br />
<br />
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br />
<br />
&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br />
<br />
&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br />
<br />
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8336,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8235,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br /><br />&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br /><br />For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br /><br />The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br /><br />Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br /><br />The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br /><br />The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br /><br />The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br /><br />The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br /><br />&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br /><br />&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br /><br />State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8235,
	'title' => 'Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br />
<br />
&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br />
<br />
For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br />
<br />
The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br />
<br />
Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br />
<br />
The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br />
<br />
The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br />
<br />
The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br />
<br />
The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br />
<br />
&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br />
<br />
&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br />
<br />
State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 11 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas/articleshow/8809545.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'singur-ordinance-falls-through-on-mamata-faux-pas-by-sutanuka-ghosal-8336',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8336,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8235
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers.<br /><br />&quot;The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented,&quot; Banerjee said on Friday. &quot;Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it.&quot;<br /><br />For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during &quot;recess of legislature&quot;.<br /><br />The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said.<br /><br />Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas<br /><br />The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party.<br /><br />The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the &quot;compensation&quot; they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units.<br /><br />The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation.<br /><br />The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication.<br /><br />&quot;Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation .&quot; He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997.<br /><br />&quot;It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ,&quot; a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: &quot;Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount.&quot;<br /><br />State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, &quot;I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional&quot; . <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Singur Ordinance falls through on Mamata faux pas by Sutanuka Ghosal

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced a major embarrassment on Friday as she was forced to put on hold an ordinance restoring land in Singur to farmers. The state government on Friday instead proposed to table a Bill in the legislative assembly on Tuesday so that the land in Singur-currently the site of an abandoned Tata Motors factory-can eventually be given back to farmers. "The ordinance that was promulgated on Thursday will not be implemented," Banerjee said on Friday. "Instead, we will bring a Bill in the state assembly on Singur. My intention was very clear. We had promised to return 400 acres to unwilling Singur farmers and we will have to do it." For the 21-day-old government, the episode is a major embarrassment. But for the battered CPM, it came as a badly-needed boost, since it was the Left delegation to Governor MK Narayanan that caused this reversal. The delegation, according to people familiar with the matter, pointed out that the ordinance was unconstitutional since it violated Article 213, which talks about the powers of a governor to promulgate ordinances during "recess of legislature". The governor summoned state chief secretary Samar Ghosh after the meeting with the Left delegation. He was far from happy with the way things had gone since Thursday's announcement of an ordinance, people familiar with the matter said. Combination of Factors Led to Unprecedented Faux Pas The chief minister's announcement jettisoning the ordinance came after this meeting. A combination of factors contributed to this unprecedented faux pas: Banerjee's haste in claiming credit for just about everything and the awe in which she is held by almost everybody in her party. The incident of the 'withdrawn' ordinance comes even as the Tatas indicated for the first time what could be the "compensation" they were hoping to get out of Singur. In a recent letter to the state government , Tata Motors managing director PM Telang said the Tatas had spent Rs 440 crore on development of the Singur area while vendors had spent Rs 170 crore for setting up their units. The letter does not say the government must pay this much, but it describes the amount as cost incurred and asks the government to compensate. State government officials feel this may be what the Tatas expect to get by way of compensation. The officials felt the letter also indicates the Tatas are not averse to parting with the land at Singur. Subrata Gupta, MD of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation confirmed that the government had received such a communication. "Tata Motors has written to us that the company has incurred a cost of . 440 crore for development of Singur . The vendors have incurred an expenditure of . 170 crore, the letter says. The letter also mentions that Tatas need to be compensated but they do not spell out whether this . 610 crore is the exact amount of compensation ." He said Tata Motors has taken most other plant items, including machinery, from Singur. Talking about the likely way forward after Banerjee's announcement on Friday, legal luminaries said the state can now amend Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as was done in Tamil Nadu in 1997. "It will virtually have to be the same model used by Tamil Nadu in 1997 when it returned land to farmers in somewhat similar circumstances ," a land lawyer said. ET had reported on May 25 that the West Bengal government was most likely to follow the TN model to give land back to Singur farmers, after talking to industry secretary Dipankar Mukherjee. In TN also, Section 48 of the central act had been amended to say: "Where the government is satisfied that the land, vested in the government under this act, is not required for the purpose for which it was acquired , or for any other public purpose, the government may transfer such land to the original owner, who is willing to repay the amount." State government sources had then said a similar amendment may be carried out in West Bengal too, after obtaining the president's consent, which is mandatory. Speaking to ET, Somnath Chatterjee, ex-speaker of Lok Sabha, said, "I have not seen the ordinance. Neither have I any knowledge about the contents . Therefore, I cannot say whether it is bad or good. But the parliamentary practice suggests that no ordinance can be promulgated when the assembly is in session. Therefore , it is unconstitutional" .