Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11699, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'metaKeywords' => 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11699 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off' $metaKeywords = 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11699, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'metaKeywords' => 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11699 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off' $metaKeywords = 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9e27ab6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11699, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'metaKeywords' => 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11699 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites&#039; defiance of IT Act sparked face-off' $metaKeywords = 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as &quot;reasonable&quot;. The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 &amp; 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11699, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'metaKeywords' => 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11699, 'title' => 'Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Legal-experts-caution-against-censorship/articleshow/11012393.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sites039-defiance-of-it-act-sparked-face-off-11817', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11817, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11699 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off' $metaKeywords = 'internet,media,ICTs,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites -...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Sites' defiance of IT Act sparked face-off |
-The Times of India Existing Indian laws, as defined by the IT Act, is viewed by experts and most website organizations as "reasonable". The government has already a set of detailed laws to deal with user generated content on websites - but the refusal of some foreign social networking sites to comply with notices sent under these laws has led to the current face-off. Under the IT Act, an intermediary (a website or company hosting the content) is duty-bound to act on a complaint relating to content (including user generated content) within 36 hours of receiving a complaint. However, official sources said some of the foreign sites have been taking the position that they will not remove the allegedly offensive content unless they receive a court order - as any content removal by them has to be in line with their global policy and US laws. This apparently has been arising out of a difference of opinion on whether some of the content complained about violates their terms of service or not - with their stand being that the alleged violation of the law may not be clear on the face of the complaint or the instance of content itself. The current IT Act, which was modified after the Baazi.com incident, is as an industry-friendly law, under which the intermediary (website) has a safe harbour provision so that the onus of user generated content falls on the person uploading this content, and not on the website unless it edits or in any way alters this user generated content. However, once it is notified of a complaint, the website is duty-bound to take action within 36 hours of receiving the complaint. Herein, the IT Act (Rules 3 & 4 of the Intermediary rules under Section 79) also specifically empowers the website to regulate, disable and remove the content - if the person who has hosted it is not willing to remove it himself. The stricter clause relates to Section 69A, under which the government can, on its own, disable content by blocking the relevant web page on grounds of a specified five areas relating to national security, sovereignty, defence, public order, etc. Failure to do so can result in imprisonment up to seven years. However, the notices served by the IT ministry to the social networking sites had not fallen under these provisos |