Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2332, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2332 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2332, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2332 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6812d0111fd62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2332, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2332 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country&rsquo;s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed &lsquo;poor&rsquo;. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research&rsquo;s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government &mdash; the Planning Commission to be specific &mdash; for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India&rsquo;s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation &mdash; or for that matter, affluence &mdash; of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU &mdash; a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand &ndash; accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country&rsquo;s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses &ndash; in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India &ndash; rural, urban, regional, etc &ndash; as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: &ldquo;Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We&rsquo;re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government&rsquo;s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2332, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2332, 'title' => 'Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 29 June, 2010, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2wheelers-tvs-fridges/639638/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'some-poor-indians-live-it-up-with-2-wheelers-tvs-fridges-by-shailesh-dobhal-2416', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2416, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2332 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A significant proportion of the country’s official below poverty line (BPL) population cannot be termed ‘poor’. Fathom this: around a fourth of the 14 million odd BPL households in urban India own a two-wheeler, a third of them a colour TV and almost two-third a pressure cooker. Almost one in five urban BPL households has at least one well-educated, graduate or above, member.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Some ‘poor Indians’ live it up with 2-wheelers, TVs, fridges by Shailesh Dobhal |
The 56 million-strong rural BPL population too exhibits varying degrees of consumption. Whilst every one in ten here have a two-wheeler, every fifth BPL village kitchen has a pressure cooker, and around 6% a CTV, according to a recent study done exclusively for FE by the National Council of Applied Economic Research’s Centre for Macro Consumer Research (NCAER-CMCR). Early this year, the government — the Planning Commission to be specific — for the purpose of the proposed Food Security Act, upped its estimate of poverty from 27.5% to 37.2% of India’s total population as BPL according to the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar committee. However, little has been known on the relative deprivation — or for that matter, affluence — of this humongous mass of 400 million people. The government will be undertaking a BPL census in April 2011 to better target its food and fuel subsidies and social sector initiatives like the Indira Awaas Yojana at the most vulnerable and poor section of Indians. NCAER-CMCR director Rajesh Shukla, who spearheaded the analysis, applied the official poverty ratio (25.7% for urban and 41.8% for rural India) to its National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure data to bring out the shades of official poor in India. The research reveals that over 13% of urban BPL households are led by a salaried chief wage earner (CWE) with a stable monthly income and under a tenth of rural BPL households have an illiterate CWE. BIMARU — a grouping of relatively low-income states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand – accounts for around 60% of all 400-million odd BPL population in the country. The southern states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) along with West Bengal make up another 25%. The country’s economically most-advanced states of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Pondicherry, Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh account for just 15% of the BPL population. The NCAER-CMCR analysis also highlights the huge diversity in Indian disparity. BPL households in South and Advance grouping of states are relatively better off than their counterparts in BIMARU and Hilly states (Assam, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh). Take household product ownership for instance. While a fourth of all BPL households in the five states that make up the South blocking own a two-wheeler, fewer than 7% in BIMARU have one. Ditto for CTV ownership. Amongst BPL households, South and Advance states have double the number compared to BIMARU. And whilst 58% of poor BIMARU households stay in kuccha houses, just one in four in Advance states dwell in one such. Till now there have been three BPL censuses – in 1992, 1997 and 2002. As the pilot for the 2011 BPL census gets underway next month, it is instructive to dwell on research like the current one by NCAER-CMCR to better equip the process to pick the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India – rural, urban, regional, etc – as it will have a strong bearing on the political economy of the country while governments, both at the Centre and state, go about implementing their inclusive development mandate. Says Rajesh Shukla, Director, NCAER-CMCR: “Our attempt here is to present the multi-dimensionality of poverty in India. We’re putting this analysis in the public domain with the hope that it may make for a nuanced and more informed debate on BPL population, which has a bearing on the government’s subsidies directed at the vulnerable sections of our society. We also hope that our analysis will add to the already vibrant debate around the methodology to be adopted for the upcoming BPL Census 2011.” |