Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680492692223d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5530, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5530 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680492692223d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5530, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5530 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680492692223d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680492692223d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680492692223d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5530, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5530 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;The NAC has released the version of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 5530, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 5530, 'title' => 'Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sonia-led-NAC-to-push-govt-on-food-net/articleshow/7344724.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'sonia-led-nac-to-push-govt-on-food-net-by-nitin-sethi-5623', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 5623, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 5530 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Food,Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = 'The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. </div><div style="text-align: justify">There are differences within the NAC as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. </div><div style="text-align: justify">In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government.</div></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Sonia-led NAC to push govt on food net by Nitin Sethi |
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has decided to stick to its recommendations on the Food Security Act which have been turned down by a committee headed by PM's chief economic adviser C Rangarajan. The NAC has released the version of the Bill it has drafted to explain that its recommendations on the size of population to be covered by the Food Security Act were feasible. The Rangarajan committee has cited food availability and government's inability to procure it to say that NAC's recommendations were impractical. The decision not to settle for a restrained approach suggested by Rangarajan and publicise NAC's case was taken at a meeting of the body on Friday. Sonia Gandhi was in chair. Sources said that the Congress chief told members of the council to explain to the people why they thought that the government could provide food security to more people than the Rangarajan panel feels it could. Just as they have detailed the reason for opposing NAC's recommendations, we should also explain why we think that it was possible to implement the recommendations of the NAC, the Congress chief is learnt to have told the NAC members. The Congress chief has pushed for a wider food safety net. NAC members feel that the government's approach is conservative. Their decision may lead the government to re-visit the issue, especially if Sonia Gandhi digs her heel in. There are differences within the NAC as well. The meeting on Friday saw members of the council differ on key provisions of the draft food security Bill. The differences got so wide that Jean Dreze informed the group that he would no more be part of the Bill drafting group. Dreze had earlier criticised the working of the NAC and the way the government was disregarding its recommendations. In the meeting, N C Saxena recommended that the entire scheduled tribes and scheduled castes not be made mandatory beneficiaries of the subsidised food scheme. Most members of the council did not agree with the proposal, but came around to accept Saxena's position. The PMO has taken a cautious line on the extent of food security cover. It has told the NAC that keeping food subsidies low was its priority and that the number of beneficiaries and the type of entitlements provided would have to dovetailed to a larger agenda of fiscal prudence. The NAC, in consultations with the concerned ministries and lawyers within and outside the government, has come close to finalising a draft Bill. But even as it was preparing the Bill, the PMO set up the Rangarajan committee which recommended that the Bill be shaved down to offer a bare minimum of entitlements and not look at turning other nutrition schemes into legal rights as well. The feud has now erupted within the NAC as well with some members claiming the Bill in its current shape was more tended to please the civil society rather than address the concerns of the government. |