Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14247, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14247 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14247, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14247 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051fcd88ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14247, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14247 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of &ldquo;public importance&rdquo;. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14247, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14247, 'title' => 'Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 13 April, 2012, http://business-standard.com/india/news/spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-/471192/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'spectrum-order-issues-prez-reference-in-sc-14371', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14371, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14247 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources.</div><div style="text-align: justify">Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Spectrum order issues: Prez reference in SC |
-The Business Standard The Union government on Thursday approached the Supreme Court with a presidential reference on various issues relating to its recent judgment in the 2G spectrum scam. The apex court, meanwhile, would take up the government's review petition tomorrow. The presidential reference, under Article 143 of the Constitution, and the review petition raise similar issues. The main concern of the government is the perceived interference of the judiciary in the executive territory and the court's insistence on auctions to distribute natural resources like spectrum. The Cabinet had on April 10 cleared the telecom ministry's proposal to seek the court's opinion on issues highlighted by the February 2 judgment. The court had cancelled 122 licences issued on a first-come-first-served policy since 2008. It had also observed auction was the best-suited route for allocating natural resources. Among the eight questions referred to the court include whether all other telecom licences given under the first-come-first-served basis before 2008 should be declared illegal and cancelled. A more fundamental issue is whether the judgment lays down auction as mandatory for allocation of all natural resources across all sectors and in all circumstances. Any view on this could have an impact on various other sectors, including mining leases, land allocations and auction of coal and oil blocks. The government has also asked whether the allotment of spectrum could be made only to a licencee who was successful in an auction process, and whether no allotments could be made from time to time. Another issue was whether no ceiling on the acquisition of spectrum could be placed according to the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, even if it is to avoid dominance in the market. It also asked whether auctions would be the only legitimate mode of allocation of spectrum, even for bands where there was inadequate competition or no competition at all, like the CDMA in 800 Mhz. The government also raised concern on the implication on foreign direct investment if the executive decision was cancelled by a judicial order. Under Article 143 of the Constitution, the government can make a presidential reference to the Supreme Court on matters of law or facts of “public importance”. Last week, the Supreme Court had dismissed review petitions of leading telecom companies, whose licences, issued when A Raja was the telecom minister, were cancelled by the court judgment. These were dismissed in chambers by a bench headed by G S Singhvi. In a rare instance, the government's review petition has been listed in open court. The case would be heard by Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan. Opening a third front, the government has also filed a clarificatory petition, asking for directions on the auction timeline in 400 days, along with other issues.
|