Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1566, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1566 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1566, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1566 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee110b64551-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee110b64551-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1566, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1566 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government&rsquo;s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of &ldquo;food coupons&rdquo; be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of &lsquo;food stamps&rsquo;, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government&mdash; this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS &lsquo;leaks&rsquo; out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage &mdash; only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by &lsquo;errors&rsquo; and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion &mdash; surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The &lsquo;divisibility&rsquo; of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to &lsquo;pay&rsquo; for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission&rsquo;s own study shows that the government&rsquo;s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1566, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1566, 'title' => 'Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 8 April, 2010, http://telegraphindia.com/1100408/jsp/opinion/story_12304072.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'stamp-of-possibility-by-bhaskar-dutta-1643', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1643, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1566 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,PDS' $metaDesc = ' An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=42">public distribution system</a> has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step.<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Stamp of possibility by Bhaskar Dutta |
An inquiry committee appointed by the Supreme Court to look into the functioning of the public distribution system has just turned in a damning report to the effect that the system is riddled with corruption and has virtually collapsed in some states. This observation will not come as a surprise to most people. Indeed, it is not a coincidence that even the Central government’s own Economic Survey mentions the need for a restructuring of the PDS, and has suggested that a programme of “food coupons” be introduced in order to reduce some of the leakages associated with the PDS. The system of ‘food stamps’, as it is better known, involves the issue of stamps or coupons to the target population, entitling the beneficiaries to buy food at unregulated market prices. The use of food stamps originated in the United States of America in 1964, and has since then been used in several countries including Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Mexico and Honduras. Naturally, there has been some variation in the extent to which the system has succeeded in the different countries. However, all country evaluations report that there has been some increase in the food consumption of the target population. In the Indian context, we already have the PDS, and so the appropriate question to be asked is whether food stamps can reduce the size of the food subsidy bill without affecting consumption levels of households below the poverty line. Some idea of the quantitative magnitude of the leakages associated with the current PDS will help to emphasize the importance of this question. Under the targeted public distribution system (TPDS) introduced in 1997, only the BPL households were supposed to be provided with subsidized food. Thus, while all households were entitled to a monthly quota of 35 kilograms of foodgrain, the households classified above the poverty line were required to pay a price equivalent to the economic cost incurred by the government— this is the cost incurred by government agencies in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution. In contrast, BPL households were supposed to pay only 50 per cent of the economic cost. Since the goal of the TPDS is to restrict subsidies only to the BPL families, the system has to be evaluated in terms of the amount of income subsidy received by the poor. Some recent estimates suggest that the BPL families receive only 10 per cent of the total food subsidy bill. In other words, ninety paise out of every rupee of public money spent on the TPDS ‘leaks’ out of the system. It is important to have some idea of the sources of this leakage — only this will provide some indication of what savings can be expected from a system of food stamps. Not surprisingly, the sheer magnitude of the volume of leakage can only be accounted by ‘errors’ and inefficiencies of many different kinds. For instance, despite its name, the TPDS is very poorly targeted and there are errors of both inclusion and exclusion. The former refers to the inability of the system to prevent APL families from enjoying the subsidies meant for the poor. For instance, it is well known that in many states, the number of BPL ration cards issued far exceeds the estimated number of poor families. At least a part of this targeting error is genuinely unavoidable because it is difficult to identify, absolutely correctly, exactly which families are poor. But, the states also treat BPL ration cards as a means of rewarding their vote banks. Of course, these targeting errors will remain even under a system of food stamps since these stamps will be issued even to APL families. However, another channel through which APL families currently enjoy some subsidies can be eliminated through a proper use of food stamps. Although the prices of rice and wheat charged to APL families in the ration shops are supposed to cover the full economic cost to the government, these prices have not been revised after 2002. But, of course, the cost to the government has gone up quite considerably. An implication of this is that APL families paid only 50 per cent of the economic cost in 2009. This source of leakage can be eliminated completely if the APL families buy their foodgrain from the market. The present system also suffers from significant errors of exclusion — surprisingly large numbers of BPL families do not buy foodgrain from the PDS. An important reason for this is simply the inability of the state governments to identify every BPL family. For instance, many BPL families do not possess ration cards because they do not have a fixed abode and so have no proof of residence. Of course, the food stamps programme will face the same problem of identification. But, there will be one reason why the food stamps programme will have lower exclusion errors than the TPDS. The latter forces everyone to make purchases every fortnight and the really poor simply do not have the resources to make bulk purchases. The ‘divisibility’ of food stamps will help the poorer families get round this problem. Other factors add to the size of the overall volume of leakages. An important source is the illegal diversion of foodgrain from fair price shops to the unregulated market. Because of the price difference between subsidized grain and grain sold through regular marketing channels, there are powerful incentives to arbitrage and make illegal profits. The difference in price provides for a lucrative source of profit to unscrupulous traders. A Planning Commission estimate suggests that as much as 37 per cent of the total supply of subsidized rice and wheat was illegally diverted to the unregulated market in 2003-04. Other studies report even higher estimates. Of course, food stamps will wipe out this source of leakage completely since there will essentially be only one market for foodgrain, with the BPL families being able to ‘pay’ for their purchases with food stamps. The last source of leakage is the relatively high cost of delivery of public traders compared to the private traders. The Planning Commission’s own study shows that the government’s food subsidy costs would have been lower by 35 per cent if the government costs matched that of the private sector. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that the Economic Survey does not recommend that private traders be entrusted with complete responsibility for delivery of foodgrain. Instead, it suggests that BPL families be allowed to exchange food stamps at the fair price shops. Perhaps, the underlying rationale is that age-old institutions cannot be demolished in one step. |