Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20584, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20584 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">"Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">"The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">"Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said.</p><p align="justify">"Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">"Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20584, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20584 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">"Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">"The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">"Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said.</p><p align="justify">"Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">"Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ff06ca66913-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20584, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20584 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families,&quot; it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">&quot;Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation,&quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, &quot; the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked,&quot; the report said. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">"Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">"The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">"Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said.</p><p align="justify">"Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">"Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> "Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> "The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> "Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> "Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> "Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20584, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">"Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">"The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">"Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said.</p><p align="justify">"Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">"Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20584, 'title' => 'State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em> </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. </p> <p align="justify"> The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. </p> <p align="justify"> "Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Delay in purchase</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. </p> <p align="justify"> "The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. </p> <p align="justify"> The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. </p> <p align="justify"> The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Unacceptable land</em> </p> <p align="justify"> "Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> "Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said. </p> <p align="justify"> The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. </p> <p align="justify"> In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. </p> <p align="justify"> As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Transparency</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. </p> <p align="justify"> "Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 26 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness/article4656066.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'state-gets-the-stick-for-tribal-landlessness-g-prabhakaran-20726', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20726, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20584 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,Tribal Rights,Land Transparency,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>CAG sees weak political will, highlights failure of scheme</em></p><p align="justify"><em>Palakkad: </em>A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State.</p><p align="justify">The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001.</p><p align="justify">"Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said.</p><p align="justify"><em>Delay in purchase</em></p><p align="justify">The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds.</p><p align="justify">The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG.</p><p align="justify">"The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes.</p><p align="justify">The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development.</p><p align="justify">The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed.</p><p align="justify">The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980.</p><p align="justify">Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land.</p><p align="justify"><em>Unacceptable land</em></p><p align="justify">"Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said.</p><p align="justify">"Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said.</p><p align="justify">The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified.</p><p align="justify">Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment.</p><p align="justify">In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting.</p><p align="justify">Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families.</p><p align="justify">As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting.</p><p align="justify"><em>Transparency</em></p><p align="justify">The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order.</p><p align="justify">"Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
State gets the stick for tribal landlessness-G Prabhakaran |
-The Hindu
Palakkad: A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has charged the State with a lack of political will in providing land to landless tribal people in the State. The Audit Report (General and Social Sector) of the CAG for the financial year 2011-12 accuses the government of tardy implementation of a Rs. 175-crore scheme for the resettlement of landless tribal people launched in 2001. "Only 39 per cent of the target was achieved in distribution of land even after 10 years," it said. Delay in purchase The project was to be completed within five years, but only 39 per cent of the families identified had been given land. Purchase of land had been delayed despite the availability of funds. The report said the lack of political will was evident from the reply the government had given to the CAG. "The government replied (June 2012) that most of the land identified could be distributed only with prior permission of the Government of India [GOI], and the State government have approached the GOI for clearance of 30,124 acres of forestland for assignment to tribal families," it said. But forestland could not be used for such purposes. The government constituted the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission for implementation of the scheme in November 2001. Its main objectives were to distribute one acre to five acres of land free to each landless tribal family and infrastructure development. The Principal Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, was appointed Mission Chief. In every district, a committee chaired by the District Collector was formed. The CAG paints a dismal picture of land allotment in Palakkad, where the tribal people of Attappady alienated 10,796.16 acres between 1960 and 1980. Under the scheme, only 4.44 acres of land was distributed to 10 families. As many as 1,826 families identified as beneficiaries are yet to get land. Unacceptable land "Audit noticed that even the land distributed was not accepted by the beneficiaries as the major portion of the same was rocky and unsuitable for any type of development activities, including cultivation," the report said. "Further, 63.19 acres of land belonging to the Irrigation Department was ordered (August 2003) to be transferred to the mission for distribution. However, formalities for taking possession of the land were completed only in May 2010. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Palakkad, said (February 2012) that the land had not been distributed to beneficiaries as the selection of beneficiaries was not completed, " the report said. The report said that in Idukki district, land was allotted only to 949 of the 1,402 families identified. Though 123 acres was identified, the land could not be distributed because of encroachment. In Thiruvananthapuram district, no land was allotted though 16 families were identified. In Pathanamthitta, 12.9 acres was distributed to 28 families, but 128 more are waiting for land. In Thrissur, only 5.68 acres was allotted to 20 families with 74 families remaining. In Malappuram, 46.38 acres of land was allotted to 61 families with 733 waiting. Kannur and Wayanad districts came first in the distribution of land. In Kannur, 3,604.37 acres was allotted to 3,700 families. As many as 170 families are yet to get land in the district. In Wayanad, 2,526 acres was allotted to 997 families, but 4,913 more beneficiaries are waiting. Transparency The CAG expressed doubts about the fairness and transparency in the selection of beneficiaries in accordance with the Government Order. "Records relating to selection of beneficiaries were not available in two of the four districts test-checked," the report said. |