Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11191, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11191 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Steeper capitation fee fine</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11191, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11191 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Steeper capitation fee fine</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dba0882e5a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11191, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11191 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel&rsquo;s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 &mdash; introduced in Parliament last year &mdash; had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can &ldquo;directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or &ldquo;demand any donation&rdquo; by way of consideration for &ldquo;admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the &ldquo;high rate&rdquo; of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,&rdquo; the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. &ldquo;The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,&rdquo; a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,&rdquo; the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill&rsquo;s reintroduction in Parliament&rsquo;s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Steeper capitation fee fine</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11191, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11191, 'title' => 'Steeper capitation fee fine', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 November, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111117/jsp/nation/story_14762099.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'steeper-capitation-fee-fine-11305', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11305, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11191 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Steeper capitation fee fine' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Steeper capitation fee fine |
-The Telegraph The Union cabinet today accepted a parliamentary panel’s suggestion that a fine of Rs 1 crore, not Rs 50 lakh, would deter institutions from charging capitation fees. The suggestion was part of a report the panel submitted on a proposed law to check unfair practices in universities and technical and medical institutions. The Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and Universities Bill, 2010 — introduced in Parliament last year — had been referred to the standing committee on human resource development (HRD). According to the proposed legislation, no institution can “directly or indirectly, demand or charge or accept capitation fee or “demand any donation” by way of consideration for “admission to any seat or seats in a course or programme of study conducted by it”. The original legislation provided for a maximum penalty of Rs 50 lakh from institutions found charging capitation fees. In its report submitted in May this year, the committee suggested that a fine of Rs 50 lakh for charging capitation fees could not be an effective deterrent, one reason being the “high rate” of seats in medical colleges. “The committee is of the view that a penalty of Rs 1 crore for charging of capitation fee will act as an effective deterrent for institutions/individuals involved in such an activity,” the panel said in its report. The HRD ministry accepted this suggestion and accordingly modified the bill. “The ministry has accepted several suggestions of the standing committee, including the one for increasing the fine on institutions for charging capitation fee,” a ministry official said. “The ministry feels that Rs 50 lakh could not have checked the practice since a number of institutions, particularly medical institutions, charge more than Rs 50 lakh from a student as capitation fee,” the official added. The cabinet today approved the amendments, paving the way for the bill’s reintroduction in Parliament’s winter session. |