Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6191
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br /><br /><em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br /></em><br />After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br /><br />The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6191
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br /><br /><em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br /></em><br />After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br /><br />The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680501aebd9ba-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6191,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6285,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6191
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &amp;ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&amp;rdquo; On the NHRC&#039;s application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;No power&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State&#039;s consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &amp;ldquo;indiscriminate&amp;rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &amp;ldquo;directly&amp;rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &amp;ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&amp;rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br /><br /><em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br /></em><br />After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br /><br />The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6191,
		'title' => 'Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br />
<br />
<em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br />
</em><br />
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br />
<br />
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br />
<br />
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6285,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6191,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br /><br /><em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br /></em><br />After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br /><br />The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6191,
	'title' => 'Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br />
<br />
<em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br />
</em><br />
After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br />
<br />
During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br />
<br />
The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022561141000.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-asks-cbi-to-submit-report-on-nandigram-firing-by-j-venkatesan-6285',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6285,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6191
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: &ldquo;The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.&rdquo; On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court.<br /><br /><em>&ldquo;No power&rdquo;<br /></em><br />After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was &ldquo;indiscriminate&rdquo; and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire &ldquo;directly&rdquo; on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside.<br /><br />The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. &ldquo;The investigation report is between us and the courts,&rdquo; CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Supreme Court asks CBI to submit report on Nandigram firing by J Venkatesan

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to submit its report on the Nandigram firing in West Bengal to enable it to consider whether to permit the agency to go ahead with its plea to prosecute the erring police officials. A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the State, the CBI, the National Human Rights Commission and the CPI (M) on the incident. After hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for West Bengal, the Bench, in a brief order, said: “The CBI is directed to place the investigation reports submitted in pursuance of the order dated March 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007, before us in a sealed cover.” On the NHRC's application for a direction to the West Bengal government to pay compensation to the victims of the incidents, the Bench asked the Commission to approach the High Court. “No power” After the Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI probe, the State moved the Supreme Court contending that the court had not power to order a CBI probe without the State's consent. In December 2007, the Supreme Court allowed the CBI to complete its probe as per the High Court order but restrained it from proceeding any further and initiating prosecution against those police personnel found guilty as per the report. The CBI filed an application on August 26, 2010, to vacate that order, to proceed against the guilty officials. During the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr. Venugopal said the State had objections to the High Court order directing a CBI inquiry. The High Court, in its March 15, 2007 order, held that the firing on villagers was “indiscriminate” and also struck down some police regulations that permitted the State police to fire “directly” on an unlawful assembly to disperse them. The State government had been objecting to both these findings and urging the Supreme Court to set them aside. The CBI insisted that it would not share the inquiry report with the State. “The investigation report is between us and the courts,” CBI counsel Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha said. The issue of sanction would arise once a charge sheet was filed, Mr. Tankha argued. The Bench posted the matter to March 15.