Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6529
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br /><br />In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br /><br />Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br /><br />The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6529
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br /><br />In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br /><br />Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br /><br />The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804813681f7b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804813681f7b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6529,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6625,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6529
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women&#039;s organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &amp;ldquo;If a man has a &amp;lsquo;keep&#039; whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage&#039; for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &amp;lsquo;domestic relationship&#039;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &amp;ldquo;The expression such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&amp;hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The organisation said the use of expressions such as &amp;lsquo;keep,&#039; &amp;lsquo;one-night stand&#039; and &amp;lsquo;sex with a servant&#039; were derogatory to women and &amp;ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &amp;lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,&#039; in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br /><br />In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br /><br />Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br /><br />The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6529,
		'title' => 'Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br />
<br />
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br />
<br />
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6625,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6529,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Gender',
	'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br /><br />In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br /><br />Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br /><br />The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6529,
	'title' => 'Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br />
<br />
In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br />
<br />
The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 March, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031766101500.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-rejects-plea-for-review-of-ruling-derogatory-to-women-6625',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6625,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6529
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women'
$metaKeywords = 'Gender'
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.

In...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as &lsquo;keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status.<br /><br />In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: &ldquo;If a man has a &lsquo;keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a &lsquo;domestic relationship'.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: &ldquo;The expression such as &lsquo;keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination&hellip; The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.&rdquo;<br /><br />Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said.<br /><br />The organisation said the use of expressions such as &lsquo;keep,' &lsquo;one-night stand' and &lsquo;sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and &ldquo;is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, &lsquo;relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Supreme Court rejects plea for review of ruling “derogatory” to women

The Supreme Court has declined permission to a women's organisation for seeking a review of the judgment describing a woman as ‘keep' arguing that such an expression was derogatory to and discriminatory against women on the basis of marital status. In an October 21, 2010 judgment, a Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur said: “If a man has a ‘keep' whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a ‘relationship in the nature of marriage' for her to claim the benefit of live-in to get maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Merely spending weekends together or a one-night stand would not make it a ‘domestic relationship'.” In its petition, the Mahila Dakshta Samiti said: “The expression such as ‘keep,' which specifically refers to woman, is based on social and cultural prejudices which need to be eliminated in order to prevent discrimination… The expression would perpetuate social and cultural prejudices, and is based on the idea of stereotyping woman.” Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women called for a change in the traditional roles of men and women in bringing about gender equity. Article 2(F) provided for the States to take all appropriate measures to modify or abolish the existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constituted discrimination against women, it said. The organisation said the use of expressions such as ‘keep,' ‘one-night stand' and ‘sex with a servant' were derogatory to women and “is in contrary to what has been envisaged by Article 51A (e) of the Constitution. It sought a direction to expunge the observations made in the judgment, mainly the interpretation of the expression, ‘relationship in the nature of marriage,' in Section 2 (f) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.