Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8625
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br /><br />The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br /><br />&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br /><br />It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br /><br />This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br /><br />At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br /><br />The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br /><br />During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br /><br />The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8625
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br /><br />The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br /><br />&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br /><br />It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br /><br />This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br /><br />At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br /><br />The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br /><br />During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br /><br />The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6f077be2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8625,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8726,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8625
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government&#039;s programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors&#039; Nano car project at Singur in the state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&amp;quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors&#039; counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &amp;quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&amp;quot; wondered Rohatgi. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &amp;quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&amp;quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company&#039;s project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br /><br />The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br /><br />&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br /><br />It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br /><br />This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br /><br />At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br /><br />The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br /><br />During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br /><br />The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8625,
		'title' => 'Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br />
<br />
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br />
<br />
&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br />
<br />
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br />
<br />
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br />
<br />
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br />
<br />
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br />
<br />
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br />
<br />
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8726,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8625,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br /><br />The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br /><br />&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br /><br />It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br /><br />This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br /><br />At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br /><br />The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br /><br />During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br /><br />The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8625,
	'title' => 'Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br />
<br />
The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br />
<br />
&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br />
<br />
It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br />
<br />
This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br />
<br />
At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br />
<br />
The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br />
<br />
During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br />
<br />
The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land/articleshow/9045492.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-stops-mamata-banerjee-from-returning-singur-land-by-sanjay-k-singh-8726',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8726,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8625
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. 

The apex court asked...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. <br /><br />The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. <br /><br />&quot;As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court,&quot; said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. <br /><br />It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. &quot;Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it,&quot; wondered Rohatgi. <br /><br />This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. <br /><br />At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, &quot;Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time&quot;. It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. <br /><br />The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. <br /><br />During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. <br /><br />The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Supreme Court stops Mamata Banerjee from returning Singur land by Sanjay K Singh

The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government's programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which acquired by the previous government for Tata Motors' Nano car project at Singur in the state. The apex court asked the Calcutta High Court to decide within one month the legality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act which enables the state government to take back the land and redistribute it to the owners. "As an interim arrangement, we direct the state not to return the land to the unwilling owners until further orders being passed by the high court," said a vacation bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice AK Patnaik in its interim order on Wednesday. It passed the order on the plea of Tata Motors' counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who alleged that the state government is going ahead with its programme of redistribution of the land to farmers which were allotted to the company. Even last night, the state government had redistributed the land to 30 people. This comes at a time when the apex court was schedule to hear the case, submitted Rohatgi seeking order to restrain the government from its ongoing redistribution of such land. "Our lease for the land is for 99 years and still subsisting. How can the state government interfere with it," wondered Rohatgi. This was, however, opposed by state government counsel PP Rao. He said that the apex court should not interfere in the matter as the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011, is sub-judice before the Calcutta High Court. At this Justice Sathasivam, however, said, "Some limited protection should be given to the petitioner at this point of time". It was also backed by justice Patnaik who during the course of the hearing remarked that the matter required to be looked into as a matter of right and not as a political issue. The bench said that some interim arrangement has to be made until high court decides the matter. The apex court then asked the high court to expeditiously decide the issue of legality of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development (SLRD) Act, 2011 preferable within a period of one month. To ensure that the high court shall decide the matter in an impartial manner, the apex court in its order said, it is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case. During the hearing of the case, the apex court, observed that the state government can go ahead with the survey and processing of such land for the purposes of redistribution to the owners. However, in the order posted on the website of the apex court, it has not been mentioned. The court order came after hearing the arguments of both Tata Motors and state government counsel for nearly half an hour. Rohatgi commenced the arguments informing the bench that nearly 1,000 acres of land was acquired by then state government in 2007 for the company's project. He accused the present political dispensation in the state driving out the company from going ahead with its Nano project from Singur.