Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17309, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI,Retail', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17309 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'FDI,Retail' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17309, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI,Retail', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17309 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'FDI,Retail' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815827bc0dcb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17309, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI,Retail', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17309 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'FDI,Retail' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati&rsquo;s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: &ldquo;whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed&hellip; without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. &rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India&rsquo;s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: &ldquo;Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, &ldquo;who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: &ldquo;That is your perception. The government&rsquo;s perception is otherwise. Don&rsquo;t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17309, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI,Retail', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17309, 'title' => 'Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 7 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification/article3973577.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-examine-validity-of-fdi-notification-j-venkatesan-17437', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17437, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17309 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'FDI,Retail' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Supreme Court to examine validity of FDI notification -J Venkatesan |
-The Hindu Seeks A-G’s assistance in clarifying issues raised by PIL The Supreme Court will examine the validity of the notification the Centre issued on September 20 of its decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail. On Friday, a Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Anil R. Dave, without issuing notice, sought Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati’s assistance in clarifying certain issues, and directed advocate M.L. Sharma, who has challenged the notification, to hand over a copy of his public interest litigation petition to Mr. Vahanvati. It scheduled further hearing for October 12. Mr. Sharma said the notification was issued without any source of law and parliamentary approval. Soon after the Union Cabinet decided to allow 100 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, and disinvest in four public sector units, the notification was issued through an executive order. The petition raised important questions of law: “whether an order/notification can be issued violating Article 77 of the Constitution; whether any law, rule, regulation can be framed… without being passed/approved by Parliament; and whether a rule, regulation or law which has the potential to damage life and livelihood of citizens of India is not unconstitutional and ultra vires. ” Mr. Sharma argued that the Cabinet decision and the press note were against the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations issued on the strength of the powers derived from the Foreign Exchange Management Act; as such, it was ultra vires . When counsel submitted that the policy could not go beyond regulations, Justice Lodha told him: “Opening up the retail sector to FDI is a policy matter, and policy is exclusively in the domain of the government of the day. Some may say it is good and some may say it is bad, but nothing is ultra vires . These are matters dealt with exclusively by Ministries. Perhaps, a provision or two is missing which you [counsel] are unable to show us. Policies are the sole prerogative of the government, and nobody else.” Mr. Sharma said the notification would affect more than 35 crore citizens, “who are surviving through their small retail trade on footpath, in small shops and hand trolley, and even door to door.” Justice Lodha observed: “That is your perception. The government’s perception is otherwise. Don’t convert this court into a place for executive decisions.”
|