Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68004264b7274-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27757
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.</p><p align="justify">The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.</p><p align="justify">They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.</p><p align="justify">The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.</p><p align="justify">The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.</p><p align="justify">The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.</p><p align="justify">It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.</p><p align="justify">The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.</p><p align="justify">It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68004264b7274-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27757
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.</p><p align="justify">The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.</p><p align="justify">They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.</p><p align="justify">The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.</p><p align="justify">The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.</p><p align="justify">The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.</p><p align="justify">It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.</p><p align="justify">The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.</p><p align="justify">It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68004264b7274-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68004264b7274-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68004264b7274-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27757,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675808,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27757
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers&#039; organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We will have it on Monday,&amp;quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers&#039; organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp;amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The farmers&#039; bodies said the government&#039;s action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &amp;quot;arbitrary and violative&amp;quot; of Article 14 but also a &amp;quot;fraud on the Constitution&amp;quot; itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They said government&#039;s action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &amp;quot;malafide&amp;quot; and thus open to challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &amp;quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&amp;quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &amp;quot;colourful exercise of power&amp;quot; on Executive&#039;s part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petitioners also said the &amp;quot;deliberate proroguing&amp;quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &amp;quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de&#039;etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &amp;quot;judiciously&amp;quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&amp;quot; the petition said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&amp;quot; the petition said. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.</p><p align="justify">The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.</p><p align="justify">They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.</p><p align="justify">The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.</p><p align="justify">The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.</p><p align="justify">The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.</p><p align="justify">It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.</p><p align="justify">The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.</p><p align="justify">It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 27757,
		'title' => 'Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.
</p>
<p align="justify">
They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4675808,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 27757,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.</p><p align="justify">The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.</p><p align="justify">They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.</p><p align="justify">The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.</p><p align="justify">The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.</p><p align="justify">The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.</p><p align="justify">It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.</p><p align="justify">The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.</p><p align="justify">It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 27757,
	'title' => 'Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.
</p>
<p align="justify">
They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 April, 2015, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday/articleshow/46873859.cms?fro',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'supreme-court-to-hear-plea-against-re-promulgated-land-ordinance-on-monday-4675808',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4675808,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 27757
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Alienation,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.


&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We will have it on Monday,&quot; a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature.</p><p align="justify">The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation &amp; Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only &quot;arbitrary and violative&quot; of Article 14 but also a &quot;fraud on the Constitution&quot; itself.</p><p align="justify">They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was &quot;malafide&quot; and thus open to challenge.</p><p align="justify">The government &quot;deliberately&quot; did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 &quot;due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus,&quot; the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties.</p><p align="justify">The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as &quot;colourful exercise of power&quot; on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive.</p><p align="justify">The petitioners also said the &quot;deliberate proroguing&quot; of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, &quot;whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances.</p><p align="justify">It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised &quot;judiciously&quot; and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123.</p><p align="justify">The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature,&quot; the petition said.</p><p align="justify">It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances&quot; and the &quot;Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature,&quot; it said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house,&quot; the petition said. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Supreme Court to hear plea against re-promulgated land ordinance on Monday

-PTI NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Monday the plea of farmers' organisations challenging legality of the fresh promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi-led government. "We will have it on Monday," a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said, when senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, appearing for farmers' organisations sought urgent hearing of the petition. The farmers' organisations, in their plea filed yesterday, challenged the re-promulgated land ordinance, terming it as "unconstitutional" and ultra vires of the Constitution and as a "colourful exercise of power" by the executive usurping law-making powers of the legislature. The petition was filed by Bharatiya Kishan Union, Gram Sewa Samiti, Delhi Grameen Samaj and Chogama Vikas Avam, seeking a direction to restrain the government from acting upon in furtherance of the Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015. The farmers' bodies said the government's action in promulgating successive ordinances bypassing the legislative process of Parliament was not only "arbitrary and violative" of Article 14 but also a "fraud on the Constitution" itself. They said government's action in re-promulgating the ordinance was "malafide" and thus open to challenge. The government "deliberately" did not move the 2015 bill for discussion in the Rajya Sabha after its passage in the Lok Sabha between March 10 and 20 "due to lack of its numbers, political will or consensus," the petition has said in which Ministries of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs, Home Affairs, Rural Development and Cabinet Secretariat have been made parties. The petition termed the continuation and re-promulgation of ordinances as "colourful exercise of power" on Executive's part and said that in a democratic process, people cannot be governed by laws made by the Executive. The petitioners also said the "deliberate proroguing" of the Rajya Sabha on March 28, "whilst it was in Budget session only for the oblique and malafide purpose of re-promulgating the impugned Ordinance goes against the very spirit and raison de'etre underlying Article 123 of the Constitution". The plea contented that the government has abandoned all principles of Constitutional morality by re-promulgating the ordinances. It said the discretionary power of the President to promulgate ordinances has to be exercised "judiciously" and within the strict paradigm of circumstances, circumscribing the exercise of such discretion under Article 123. The law-making function under the Constitution was vested in Parliament, it added. "It is submitted that if the Executive was permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance by issuing successive ordinances without submitting the same to the voice of the Parliament, it is nothing but usurpation by the Executive of the law-making powers of the Legislature," the petition said. It said merely because the executive does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha, nor the political will, it cannot be permitted to continue the law-making exercise by way of an Ordinance. "Life and liberty of citizens cannot be regulated by Ordinances" and the "Executive cannot indirectly arrogate to itself the law making function of the Legislature," it said. "The ordinance making power under Article 123 was never meant to be a substitute to overcome lack of numbers of the executive in one house," the petition said.