Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 10828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....',
'disp' => '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 10828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....'
$disp = '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 10828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....',
'disp' => '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 10828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....'
$disp = '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680202a7ed46d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 10828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....',
'disp' => '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 10828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....'
$disp = '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 10828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....',
'disp' => '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 10828,
'title' => 'Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<div align="justify">
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br />
<br />
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br />
<br />
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br />
<br />
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 1 November, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Tata-plea-on-Singur-Act-referred-to-CJ/Article1-763661.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 10941,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 10828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case....'
$disp = '<p>-PTI</p><div align="justify">A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.<br /><br />Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.<br /><br />Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.<br /><br />After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.<br /><br />The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/tata-plea-on-singur-act-referred-to-cj-10941.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ | Im4change.org
Tata plea on Singur Act referred to CJ
-PTI
A division bench of the Calcutta High Court today referred to the Chief Justice an appeal by Tata Motors challenging an earlier order validating the Singur Act after the state questioned whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the case. Appearing for West Bengal government's industries department, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee claimed before the division bench comprising Justice K J Sengupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.
Banerjee said the appeal challenging the validity of the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 should be heard by another bench presided by Justice P C Ghosh as such matters relating to challenge of validity of an Act were under his jurisdiction.
Appearing for Tata Motors Ltd, barrister S Pal submitted the bench headed by Justice Sengupta had concurrent jurisdiction and could hear the appeal like all other appeals and as such there was no question of lack of jurisdiction.
After hearing both the parties, the bench decided to refer the matter to Chief Justice J N Patel to clarify whether it had jurisdiction or not to hear the matter. TML has challenged the order of Justice I P Mukerji, who had upheld the constitutionality of Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, by which West Bengal government vested the land leased to the company at Singur.
The court had, after passing the order on September 28, given an unconditional stay of the judgement till November two to allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nano car plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem.
