Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6187,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6187
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6187,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6187
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8251ea3769-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6187,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6187
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: &ldquo;The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say &ldquo;we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.&rdquo; When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6187,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6187,
'title' => 'Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br />
<br />
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br />
<br />
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/25/stories/2011022564991700.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6281,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6187
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.<br /><br />Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.<br /><br />Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.<br /><br />Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”<br /><br />Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.<br /><br />Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.<br /><br />Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/tata-seeks-comprehensive-probe-into-niira-radia-tapes-leak-by-j-venkatesan-6281.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org
Tata seeks comprehensive probe into Niira Radia tapes leak by J Venkatesan
Industrialist Ratan Tata, while questioning in the Supreme Court the Centre's lackadaisical attitude in allowing free distribution and publication of his private conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia recorded by the Directorate-General of Income Tax, sought a comprehensive probe into the leakage.
Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for Mr. Tata, made this submission before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K.Ganguly, hearing a writ petition alleging that the publication of the tapes without taking any step to retrieve the stored material or to find out the source of leakage had infringed upon his right to privacy.
Mr. Salve argued that the power of the law enforcement agencies to record telephone conversations itself was a serious encroachment upon the right of privacy guaranteed by Article 21. He made it clear that the present petition was not designed to somehow keep back from publication any conversation to which his client allegedly was a party for any oblique purpose. It was filed to seek redress of a wholesale violation of the constitutional rights of a large number of persons, including the petitioner and including a host of corporate entities by the indiscriminate publication of wiretrap material procured by questionable means.
Mr. Salve did not agree with the media's claim on right to information that it was a matter of public importance. He said: “The question here is whether indiscriminate disclosure of private conversations by a person alleged to be a lobbyist with a host of people [including media persons, other private persons, corporate employees, her own employees] can be justified as an exercise of the right of free speech which outweighs right to privacy, or whether it constitutes an invasion of the right to privacy.”
Counsel argued that media could not malign a person by indiscriminate publication of the conversations and say “we [media] have no idea whether the contents are true or false.” When Justice Ganguly wanted to know whether the media should verify the contents before publishing them, counsel said it should be the obligation of the law enforcing agency to ensure that the unverified material should not be made available in the public domain.
Mr. Salve submitted that the media should be restrained from publishing and broadcasting unverified conversations as the right to privacy could not be violated under the garb of freedom of the press.
Mr. Salve, citing an earlier Supreme Court judgment, argued that publishing a material obtained in violation of the Official Secrets Act was not protected by the right to speech. Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the Outlook magazine, intervened during Mr. Salve's arguments and contended that there was nothing private in these conversations once they were put in the public domain.
