Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 36243,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'metaKeywords' => 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 36243
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar'
$metaKeywords = 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tax reason for Aadhaar</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 36243,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'metaKeywords' => 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 36243
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar'
$metaKeywords = 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tax reason for Aadhaar</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0ac4b1c78f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 36243,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'metaKeywords' => 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 36243
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar'
$metaKeywords = 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />&quot;This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence,&quot; Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />&quot;Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Tax reason for Aadhaar</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 36243,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'metaKeywords' => 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 36243,
'title' => 'Tax reason for Aadhaar',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br />
<br />
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br />
<br />
"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br />
<br />
"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 April, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'tax-reason-for-aadhaar-4684351',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4684351,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 36243
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tax reason for Aadhaar'
$metaKeywords = 'Income Tax,Income Tax Evasion,Permanent Account Number (PAN),aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.<br /><br />The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.<br /><br />The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.<br /><br />The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.<br /><br />"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.<br /><br />"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/tax-reason-for-aadhaar-222579?ref=india-new-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar with bank accounts and PAN cards was intended to screen genuine tax payers from dishonest elements evading taxes.
The government made the comments while trying to allay fears that people could be harassed for money-laundering offences.
Appearing for the Centre and the Aadhaar-issuing Unique Identification Authority of India, additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta told a five-judge constitution bench that the newly introduced Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, which provides for mandatory linking of PAN with Aadhaar cards, was constitutionally valid and could not be declared as violative of Article 21 as urged by a batch of petitioners who have challenged the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.
The constitution bench has Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.
The petitioners had argued that making Aadhaar mandatory for filing tax returns or opening bank accounts presumed guilt or criminality especially in the context of the amendment to the Money Laundering Rules and a person not complying with the provision could be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
"This presumption which is sought to be made by the petitioners has no basis in law and fails to conceptually appreciate the necessary jurisprudence," Mehta told the bench.
"Requiring Aadhaar is akin to screening genuine persons from the dishonest ones or vice versa. Even assuming without admitting that requirement of Aadhaar affects the right to privacy in some manner, it is a reasonable restriction which is permissible under the Constitution and does not presume any guilt or criminality," he added.
