Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11336, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11336 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11336, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11336 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f541c5e5ff7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11336, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11336 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp; A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and &quot;non-application&quot; of facts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to &quot;political motives&quot;.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said &quot;prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of &quot;hand-held thermal imager&quot; to the Indian Army.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11336, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11336, 'title' => 'Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 22 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman/articleshow/10827208.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tehelka-expose-sc-refused-to-quash-proceeding-against-bangaru-laxman-11451', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11451, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11336 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Tehelka expose: SC refused to quash proceeding against Bangaru Laxman |
-PTI The Supreme Court today refused to quash criminal proceedings against former BJP chief Bangaru Laxman for allegedly receiving Rs one lakh bribe from undercover scribes to favour them in a 'fictitious' defence deal. A bench headed by Justice A K Ganguly refused to interfere in the proceedings of the lower court, which is conducting the trial in the case, and dismissed the plea of the 72-year-old politician. The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any observation on the merits of the case and it will be decided by the trial court. The court passed the order on an appeal filed by Laxman challenging the Delhi High Court's order refusing to quash the proceedings against him. The case, lodged by the CBI, pertains to 2001 when a sting operation was done by Tehelka news portal purportedly showing Laxman receiving money from undercover journalists, posing as arms dealers, for recommending to the Defence Ministry purchase of their wares for the Army. The video CDs of sting operation were released on May 13, in 2001 by the portal. Bangaru had approached the apex court contending that the special CBI court had taken cognisance on the basis of erroneous facts and "non-application" of facts. He had alleged that CBI had adopted a partisan approach in the entire case owing to "political motives". He had submitted that in a bid to implicate him, CBI had filed an application before the special court and obtained a pardon for his erstwhile private secretary Gurumurthy to turn him an approver and prosecution witness. It was alleged that Bangaru, being the BJP President, had promised to utilise his connections for awarding the contract as the NDA government was in power at that time. The lower court had in May framed charges against Bangaru under section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification and said "prima facie it appears that the accused accepted money." The CBI charge sheet said the Tehelka scribes, under the guise of representatives of West End International, had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence-related products. CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply certain products to the Army. Tehelka had released the CDs of Laxman allegedly accepting money for awarding a contract to a fictitious UK based company M/s West End International for supply of "hand-held thermal imager" to the Indian Army. |