Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10269, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10269 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10269, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10269 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f872f6c68b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10269, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10269 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar&#039;s poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot; Ahluwalia...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, &quot;not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. &quot;We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries,&quot; Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of &quot;imposing&quot; state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has &quot;supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level.&quot; Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. &quot;The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes,&quot; a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as &quot;this is how monthly budgets are normally understood&quot;. Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a &quot;cap&quot; to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10269, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10269, 'title' => 'Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 4 October, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-10-04/news/30242654_1_poverty-line-aam-aadmi-rural-households', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tendulkar039s-poverty-line-not-meant-to-be-an-acceptable-level-of-living-for-aam-aadmi-montek-singh-ahluwalia-10380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10269 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food,food security bill,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Tendulkar's poverty line not meant to be an acceptable level of living for aam aadmi: Montek Singh Ahluwalia |
-The Economic Times Pressure from within and outside the government has forced Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia to clarify that the Tendulkar Commission's poverty line was, "not meant to be an acceptable level of living for the aam aadmi." Ahluwalia said a new methodology will be worked out to determine entitlements of beneficiaries under various schemes for poor. A Socio-Economic and Caste-Economic census was also underway to survey all rural households to collect information about socio-economic indicators. The census is expected to be completed by January. In a meeting between Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh that preceded their joint press conference, it was decided not to use the Planning Commission's state-wise poverty estimates for determining the number of households to be included in government's poverty-alleviation programmes. "We are now clearly, categorically and unequivocally saying there is no link between state-wise poverty estimates done by Planning Commission and the selection of (welfare) beneficiaries," Ramesh said. Eligibility and entitlement of rural households for different central government schemes will be determined after the Census is completed in January. In the meantime, an expert committee will be constituted by the rural development ministry and the Commission, which will consult with states, civil society and other experts, to develop a methodology to ensure that no poor or deprived household is left out of the beneficiary list. The expert committee will ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security bill, when it is finalised. This puts an end to the Planning Commission's system of "imposing" state-wise caps on the deprivation or poverty list. The deputy chairman said that the Planning Commission has "supported the idea that entitlements should go beyond the poverty line level." Ahluwalia's clarification comes in the wake of outrage within government and protests in the Opposition over an affidavit to the Supreme Court which said that the Expert Group on Methodology for Estimation of Poverty's calculation of poverty line - 32 per day in urban areas and 26 in rural areas for a family of 5 - was good enough. The deputy chairman's acknowledgement that the Commission's poverty line represented a 'distress level' and not 'a comfortable level' could force the government to review the beneficiaries of the Food Security Act. The proposed legislation, cleared by an empowered group of ministers, puts the 'priority category' -households that receive grain at highly subisidised prices - at 41% of the rural population. "The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will not be used to impose any ceiling on the number of households to be included in the different government programmes and schemes," a joint statement issued by the rural development ministry and the Planning Commission states. The deputy chairman said that the Commission had reported the poverty line in terms of monthly expenditure of a family of five (4824 for urban and 3,905 for rural areas) as "this is how monthly budgets are normally understood". Even as he offered the explanation, Ahluwalia said that these figures were not meant to be a "cap" to determine who was poor. While the Planning Commission is not withdrawing the controversial affidavit, the poverty line has been effectively made an academic exercise. |