Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4683, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4683 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Theatre of political conflict on land shifts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4683, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4683 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Theatre of political conflict on land shifts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680578bd656ee-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680578bd656ee-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4683, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4683 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the &ldquo;land scam&rdquo; that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition &ndash; whether in Nandigram or Singur &mdash; can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of &ldquo;shady land deals&rdquo; and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process &ndash; particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab &ndash; can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Theatre of political conflict on land shifts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4683, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4683, 'title' => 'Theatre of political conflict on land shifts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article942734.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'theatre-of-political-conflict-on-land-shifts-4774', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4774, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4683 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Theatre of political conflict on land shifts' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = 'Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat allegedThree years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Combative mode</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Offer dismissed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Counter-attack</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Theatre of political conflict on land shifts |
Forcible acquisition of land for setting up of township at Rajarhat alleged Three years after Nandigram and two years after Singur, the theatre of political combat over land in West Bengal has shifted to Rajarhat on the northeastern fringe of Kolkata, where the Trinamool Congress braces itself for a fresh movement against what it alleges is forcible and dubious acquisition of land for the township coming up in the area. And the Left Front Government faces the prospect of yet another attempt to torpedo its development plans. At a protest rally close to the office at Salt Lake of the State's Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO), which is responsible for the setting up of the township at Rajarhat, the Trinamool Congress leadership on Thursday made clear its intent to take forward its agitation. It even demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the “land scam” that it alleges the project is enmeshed in. The party's battle-cry is reminiscent of the one it raised at Singur: return of a portion of the land allegedly handed over to authorities under duress. The campaign in Nandigram also fed on rumours that land there was in the process of being grabbed. Now the battleground has changed; not the agenda of the Trinamool which has upped the ante given that the critical Assembly polls are due in just about six months. Combative mode Projecting itself as a party that is on the side of the land-losers in any debate over acquisition – whether in Nandigram or Singur — can yield substantial dividends in an election, recent history has shown. With this in mind the Trinamool is clearly in combative mode. After all, the land acquisition process at Rajarhat began more than a decade ago. The protests are being heard only recently. The Trinamool has been demanding that 400 acres of land allegedly forcibly acquired (out of 997.11 acres) for the then proposed Tata Motors small car project at Singur be handed back to the owners, has now sought the return of ten per cent of land acquired and developed for the Rajarhat township. Its chief Mamata Banerjee has accused the authorities of “shady land deals” and equated the goings-on there with the scam in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing Society. If anything the scuttling by the Trinamool of the proposed projects both at Nandigram and Singur has only strengthened the resolve of Left Front government to shrug off their legacies and go ahead with its plans for the Rajarhat township where commercial complexes, housing projects and IT centres are among the facilities coming up. Offer dismissed Claiming to be speaking from a position of authority, Housing Minister Gautam Deb, who is also HIDCO chairman, challenged Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee to allow the setting up of a Tata Motors unit at Singur in return for not 10 but 11 per cent of the land at Rajarhat which she is demanding be returned. The latter has dismissed the offer, saying that she is not compelled to respond to offers made by leaders of such (read low) standing. Counter-attack Aware that the political price to be paid for any land acquisition process – particular in the face of charges by the Opposition of forcible grab – can be heavy, HIDCO has not only gone on the counter-attack rubbishing the Trinamool accusation that a portion of the land for the Rajarhat township had been acquired through coercion; it has gone further. It has come up with an impressive eight-point rehabilitation package for the land-losers comparable only to the one announced by the State Government for those who had given away their plots at Singur. And all this when Ms Banerjee, as Railway Minister, keeps asserting that land will not be forcibly acquired for railway projects amid questions being asked in Left circles why she should not return 10 per cent of the 3,500 acres acquired by the Railways if her demand for the return of the same percentage of land developed for the Rajarhat township is to merit any serious thought. |