Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8737, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8737 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8737, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8737 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681140d5cb67b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8737, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8737 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an &ldquo;alternative approach&rdquo; to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The &ldquo;third way&rdquo; is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a &ldquo;Frankenstein's monster.&rdquo;<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill &mdash; which itself has undergone several changes &mdash; and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption &mdash; the Prime Minister included &mdash; leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8737, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8737, 'title' => 'Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /> <br /> On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /> <br /> <em>Consultations<br /> </em><br /> The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /> <br /> The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /> <br /> The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 July, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2159756.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'third-lokpal-alternative-in-the-offing-by-vidya-subrahmaniam-8839', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8839, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8737 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI). On July...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).<br /><br />On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it.<br /><br /><em>Consultations<br /></em><br />The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.”<br /><br />The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies.<br /><br />The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Third Lokpal alternative in the offing by Vidya Subrahmaniam |
With two rival versions of the Lokpal Bill already competing for public attention, the stage now seems to have been set for the emergence of a third alternative, courtesy the National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI).
On July 6, the NCPRI, whose working committee includes National Advisory Council (NAC) member Aruna Roy, will present an “alternative approach” to the rival Lokpal Bills, drafted separately after talks broke down between the five activists and five Ministers on the Joint Drafting Committee. The “third way” is expected to be an improvement on both the Jan Lokpal Bill, drafted by the Anna Hazare side, and the watered-down ministerial version offered in opposition to it. Consultations The NCPRI and the NAC had been in the thick of consultations on the Lokpal Bill when the government, bowing to pressure from Mr. Hazare, announced the formation of the Joint Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee. The NAC withdrew from further consultations on the Bill, while the NCPRI said it would continue to hold broad-based discussions towards evolving a structurally and legally sound Lokpal Bill. At a consultative meeting, held on April 16, 2011, NCPRI members roundly criticised the clauses of the Jan Lokpal Bill, calling it a “Frankenstein's monster.” The NCPRI has since looked exhaustively at the draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill — which itself has undergone several changes — and the version finalised by the ministerial representatives. The NCPRI's position is that while the ministerial draft is flawed, it is also unable to accept the concentration of powers envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill, preferring instead that the functions and responsibilities of the Lokpal be divided among multiple bodies. The NCPRI's argument is that the Jan Lokpal Bill has made itself unsustainable by being too ambitious and combining too many objectives. Judicial accountability, political corruption and grievance redress, all of which have been brought within the ambit of the Jan Lokpal Bill, would each require a different approach as well as a mechanism of its own. The NCPRI wants the Lokpal to look primarily at high-level political corruption — the Prime Minister included — leaving judicial accountability and grievance redress to be addressed separately, the former by strengthening the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and the latter through the institution of a grass-roots mechanism. |