Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4244, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4244 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4244, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4244 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680b25ea1ac06-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4244, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4244 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. &ldquo;We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,&rdquo; Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: &ldquo;There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no &ldquo;forcible acquisition&rdquo;, but only &ldquo;amicable acquisition&rdquo; after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4244, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4244, 'title' => 'TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 10 November, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/TMC-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill/articleshow/6898098.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'tmc-seeks-discussion-on-land-acquisition-bill-4335', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4335, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4244 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.</font><br /><br /><font >The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET.</font><br /><br /><font >When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .”</font><br /><br /><font >Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years.</font><br /><br /><font >According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee.</font><br /><br /><font >The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research.</font><br /><br /><font >For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. </font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
TMC seeks discussion on land acquisition bill |
In a bid to stall the contentious Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, the Trinamool Congress has demanded a detailed discussion in the Lok Sabha before the legislation and the accompanying Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill are taken up for consideration in the winter session.
The Trinamool Congress, which has expressed major reservations on the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, put forward this demand at a meeting of Lok Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Tuesday. “We want a discussion on land acquisition. There are many issues that have to be raised so we want a discussion in the Lok Sabha,” Trinamool Congress chief whip Sudip Bandyopadhyay told ET. When asked whether Trinamool had agreed to the passage of the contentious bill, Mr Bandyopadhyay said: “There is no question of consent because we are talking about a discussion on the issue before the bill is considered. Our stand on the issue has been expressed explicitly by our leader Mamata Banerjee .” Ms Banerjee, whose party is eyeing major electoral gains in the forthcoming West Bengal assembly elections, has consistently maintained that the state should not have any role in land acquisition for private players. The Trinamool Congress says that no multi-crop land should be acquired and if acquisition is a certainty, there should be no “forcible acquisition”, but only “amicable acquisition” after an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The Trinamool chief has also given her formula for compensation, saying that one of the members of the affected family should be given a government job and in case no person is found eligible for a government job, s/he should be given a pension for 30 years. According to sources, the government is fearing that with assembly elections around the corner, Trinamool Congress might dig in its heels and insist on another look at the bill by the standing committee. The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill makes out a case for three categories of projects for which the government can acquire 100% land. These include establishment of installations pertaining to national security, infrastructure and facilities designated as “social infrastructure”, such as health, education and space research. For any project, land could be acquired in the 70:30 ratio, with the company planning to set up the facility on that land being asked to purchase 70% of it. The state government would step into the picture only after the private player had done its bit. The state would take over the remaining 30% if it felt the project fell in the “public purpose” domain. The Trinamool Congress, however, is opposed to this clause as it does not want any role for the state government. |