Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307725811-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6514
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br /><br />&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br /><br />The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br /><br />It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307725811-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6514
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br /><br />&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br /><br />The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br /><br />It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307725811-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307725811-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307725811-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6514,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6610,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6514
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN &amp; Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India&#039;s big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &amp;quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&amp;quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&amp;quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute&#039;s Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp;amp; security structure and labour &amp;amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&amp;quot; Cato said. &amp;quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&amp;quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar&#039;s lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&amp;quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp;amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br /><br />&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br /><br />The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br /><br />It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6514,
		'title' => 'TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br />
<br />
&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br />
<br />
&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br />
<br />
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br />
<br />
&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br />
<br />
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6610,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6514,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Governance',
	'metaDesc' => '
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br /><br />&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br /><br />The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br /><br />It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6514,
	'title' => 'TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br />
<br />
&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br />
<br />
&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br />
<br />
The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br />
<br />
&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br />
<br />
It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 16 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart/articleshow/7715559.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'tn-bihar-at-two-ends-of-economic-freedom-chart-6610',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6610,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6514
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart'
$metaKeywords = 'Governance'
$metaDesc = '
Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. &quot;The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom,&quot; Cato said in a posting on its website.<br /><br />&quot;The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance.&quot; The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal &amp; security structure and labour &amp; business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ,&quot; Cato said. &quot;Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states.&quot; The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said.<br /><br />The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009.<br /><br />&quot;It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory,&quot; Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu &amp; Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states.<br /><br />It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

TN & Bihar at two ends of Economic freedom chart

Tamil Nadu offers maximum economic freedom and Bihar the least among 20 of India's big states, according to a study released on Tuesday. The Economic Freedom of the States in India 2011 ranked the states based on the extent of wealth, administrative and social parameters in 2009. The USbased Cato Institute published the rankings in association with Indicus Analytics and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Both the states retained their positions since 2005. "The new report shows that there is a great diversity among Indian states in terms of economic freedom," Cato said in a posting on its website. "The study finds that states with more economic freedom tend to have better economic performance." The study used a methodology adapted from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. It followed three broad parameters?state size, legal & security structure and labour & business regulation?to arrive at the conclusion. Gujarat ranked second in the report, moving up three ranks since 2005. The state continued to offer the most efficient regulatory system, the study said. But Andhra Pradesh registered the fastest improvement in economic freedom, moving up from seventh position in 2005 to third in 2009. "Andhra Pradesh reduced waste and corruption and implemented innovative reforms ," Cato said. "Three factors?buoyant agriculture, rural infrastructure, and the elimination of Maoism?boosted employment and attracted in-migration from other states." The state registered maximum improvement in terms of ease of doing business with respect to labour and other regulations and saw lesser strikes and lockouts. Even as some states improved in economic freedom, others worsened, showing that there is no uniform all-India trend, the study said. The bottom three states in 2009, in reverse order, were Bihar , Uttarakhand and Assam. While Bihar was the still the last in 2005, Assam was 19th and West Bengal was 18th. Bihar's lowest ranking was despite improvement in its legal and security structure. The states with the largest decreases in economic freedom were Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. Punjab, once among the best performers, slipped from sixth position in 2005 to 12th in 2009. "It has been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, is anything but satisfactory," Cato said. Haryana, Tamil Nadu , West Bengal, Rajasthan and Jammu & Kashmir registered moderate increases in economic freedom. Maharashtra, Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines . Madhya Pradesh saw a deterioration in its regulatory index though the fall was somewhat compensated by progress made in improving legal structure and security apparatus. The study said more economic freedom translated into faster growth of the states. It said the states that showed largest decreases in economic freedom had an average annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.7% between 2004-05 and 2008-09 . States with moderate decline averaged 8.7% while those that improved the most (Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat) averaged 10.5%. The study said states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh, although on a high growth trajectory , ranked low mainly because their growth was characterized by a single sector , for example construction in Bihar and mining and basic industry in Chhattisgarh.