Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5672
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash;..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br /><br />Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br /><br />But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br /><br />The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br /><br />The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br /><br />The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br /><br />The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5672
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash;..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br /><br />Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br /><br />But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br /><br />The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br /><br />The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br /><br />The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br /><br />The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f9be84fbbe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5672,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5765,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5672
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash;...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &amp;mdash; the UPA&#039;s flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership&#039;s stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership&#039;s stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Advisory Council&#039;s working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act&#039;s provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash;..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br /><br />Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br /><br />But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br /><br />The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br /><br />The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br /><br />The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br /><br />The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 5672,
		'title' => 'Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br />
<br />
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br />
<br />
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br />
<br />
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br />
<br />
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br />
<br />
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br />
<br />
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 5765,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 5672,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights',
	'metaDesc' => '

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash;...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br /><br />Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br /><br />But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br /><br />The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br /><br />The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br /><br />The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br /><br />The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 5672,
	'title' => 'Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br />
<br />
Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br />
<br />
The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br />
<br />
But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br />
<br />
The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br />
<br />
The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br />
<br />
The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br />
<br />
The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 29 January, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tribal-ministry-rejects-Sonia-panel-advice/articleshow/7383288.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'tribal-ministry-rejects-sonia-panel-advice-by-nitin-sethi-5765',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 5765,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 5672
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi'
$metaKeywords = 'Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act,Tribal Rights'
$metaDesc = '

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash;...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act &mdash; the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. <br /><br />Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. <br /><br />The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. <br /><br />But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. <br /><br />The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. <br /><br />The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. <br /><br />The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. <br /><br />The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Tribal ministry rejects Sonia panel advice by Nitin Sethi

The Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been snubbed once again by the government, this time by the tribal affairs ministry. The ministry rejected all recommendations made by the council to reform the implementation of the Forest Rights Act — the UPA's flagship programme and law to give land rights back to tribals and forest dwellers. The National Advisory Council had recommended strong measures for restoration of forest lands to tribals and to provide them access to timber and forest produce. Its members feel that the recommendations gel with the Congress leadership's stand to put an end to tribal alienation. The war between the council and the government had already spilled out in the open with both of them unable to see eye to eye on key issues like the Right to Information Act, the rural employment guarantee scheme and the food security bill. Now the dismissive response from the tribal affairs ministry on Forest Rights Act is only going to add to the perception of the two not being on the same page. The National Advisory Council had prepared a set of recommendations advising reforms and changes in the provisions of the Act to facilitate return of alienated lands to tribals. The council approached the task against the backdrop of the Congress leadership's stand that tribal alienation in the heartland had to be brought down in order to arrest the spread of leftwing extremism. The National Advisory Council's working group on tribal concerns recorded that the Forest Rights Act had been poorly implemented and that its rules were plagued by loopholes. They prepared a note recommending changes. But first, the National Advisory Council secretariat asked the council members get its note vetted by the tribal affairs and environment ministry. Both sought time to respond, the environment ministry demanding at least a month. The tribal affairs ministry has now shot back a reply claiming none of the changes the council recommends are required and the Act is being implemented just fine. The recommendations included bringing in transparency into the rights recognition process as too many claims were being rejected across the country. The council suggested how to reduce arbitrary decisions at the district and lower levels, but these too the ministry found worthless. The council had noted that collective rights over land and forest resources had been especially neglected during implementation of the law. The National Advisory Council suggested more pro-active involvement of the government to give these rights to villages as well as provide other avenues to the alienated groups in terms of rights over timber in their forestlands. The ministry rejected any pro-active measures and dismissed the question of rights over timber as being extra-legal. The ministry also rejected any changes to the Act or the rules that would invite penalties for officials who do not implement the Forest Rights Act's provisions.