Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 35425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-TheCitizen.in<br /><br /><em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br /><br />NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br /><br />Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br /><br />In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br /><br />But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br /><br />1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br /><br />2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br /><br />3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br /><br />4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br /><br />5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br /><br />6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad" title="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 35425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-TheCitizen.in<br /><br /><em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br /><br />NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br /><br />Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br /><br />In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br /><br />But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br /><br />1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br /><br />2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br /><br />3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br /><br />4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br /><br />5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br /><br />6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad" title="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec301d1309f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 35425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4683532,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 35425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-TheCitizen.in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &amp;ldquo;some lacunae&amp;rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &amp;ldquo;poor Muslim woman&amp;rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &amp;ldquo;mislead&amp;rdquo; the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&amp;rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-TheCitizen.in<br /><br /><em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br /><br />NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br /><br />Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br /><br />In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br /><br />But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br /><br />1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br /><br />2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br /><br />3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br /><br />4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br /><br />5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br /><br />6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad" title="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 35425,
		'title' => 'Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-TheCitizen.in<br />
<br />
<em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br />
<br />
NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br />
<br />
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br />
<br />
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br />
<br />
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br />
<br />
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br />
<br />
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br />
<br />
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br />
<br />
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br />
<br />
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br />
<br />
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br />
<br />
Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4683532,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 35425,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap',
	'metaDesc' => '
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-TheCitizen.in<br /><br /><em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br /><br />NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br /><br />Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br /><br />In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br /><br />But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br /><br />1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br /><br />2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br /><br />3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br /><br />4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br /><br />5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br /><br />6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad" title="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 35425,
	'title' => 'Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-TheCitizen.in<br />
<br />
<em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br />
<br />
NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br />
<br />
Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br />
<br />
In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br />
<br />
But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br />
<br />
1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br />
<br />
2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br />
<br />
3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br />
<br />
4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br />
<br />
5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br />
<br />
6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br />
<br />
Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'TheCitizen.in, 28 December, 2017, http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'triple-talaq-bill-in-lok-sabha-the-6-questions-that-mp-sumitra-dev-asked-law-minister-prasad-seema-mustafa-4683532',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4683532,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 35425
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa'
$metaKeywords = 'Triple Talaq,Instant Triple Talaq,Lok Sabha,Gender Inequality,Gender Gap'
$metaDesc = '
-TheCitizen.in

Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee

NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-TheCitizen.in<br /><br /><em>Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee<br /><br />NEW DELHI: </em>The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like &ldquo;some lacunae&rdquo; to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government&rsquo;s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable.<br /><br />Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the &ldquo;poor Muslim woman&rdquo; placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who &ldquo;mislead&rdquo; the people.<br /><br />In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women&rsquo;s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset.<br /><br />But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament:<br /><br />1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance?<br /><br />2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage?<br /><br />3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now?<br /><br />4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice?<br /><br />5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman?<br /><br />6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights?<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad" title="http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/2/12632/Triple-Talaq-Bill-in-Lok-Sabha-The-6-Questions-that-MP-Sumitra-Dev-Asked-Law-Minister-Prasad">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha: The 6 Questions that MP Sumitra Dev Asked Law Minister Prasad -Seema Mustafa

-TheCitizen.in Govt admits no stakeholders consulted; Opposition parties demand Bill deferred to a Standing Committee NEW DELHI: The debate in the Lok Sabha over the Triple Talaq Bill that criminalises the practice with a three year, non bailable prison term, for the erring Muslim husband belonged to Congress MP Sushmita Dev from Assam. After her senior leader Maillkarjun Kharge, had assured the BJP that the Congress was supportive of the Bill, but would like “some lacunae” to be sorted out by the Standing Committee of Parliament Dev tore into the government’s Bill with hard hitting facts and arguments that remain irrefutable. Law and Justice Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, shed tears for the “poor Muslim woman” placed on the streets by the husband with the instant declaration of triple talaq. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi spoke of the need to codify the Muslim personal law, a demand incidentally of several women organisations including the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan for reasons of course, placed in secular polity, and not in the Hindu-Muslim arguments raised by the woman MP of the ruling party. Lekhi said that there should be a law against the maulvi-maulana who “mislead” the people. In the process the government admitted that it had not consulted the stake holders, the women’s organisations, or other groups. All Opposition parties---including the till recently reticent Biju Janata Dal--- united in demanding the Bill be deferred to a parliamentary Standing Committee to sort out the issues after full discussion with all stake holders, women, experts and others. A demand that Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad rejected at the onset. But the questions asked by Dev remained on the table, and are also the questions being asked by women organisations outside Parliament: 1. If the man is put into jail for three years, in what this Bill makes a non-bailable offence who will pay the subsistence for his wife and children? The Bill is silent on this. Will the government beating its chest for Muslim women set up a corpus out of its concern for Muslim women to ensure they receive maintenance? 2. The Supreme Court abolished instant triple talaq on the grounds that this makes it impossible for reconciliation, and this opportunity has to be provided to the marital couple. The Bill places the husband in jail, so where is the opportunity for reconciliation? Or does the government think that the husband being put into jail will actually sit down and reconcile the marriage? 3. What is the method of calculating maintenance? The Bill is completely silent on this. Earlier it was to be assessed according to the standard of married life of the couple, and the financial ability of the husband. How will it be determined now? 4. The BIll places the man for three years, without bail, in jail. Other crimes that get the same punishment include rioting and armed violence, promoting enmity between groups, outraging religious sentiments. Is the Bill equating triple talaq with such criminal activity? And criminalising what is essentially a social injustice? 5. The government refused to bring a law against marital rape saying this would open a flood of litigation and raise other issues. Will not the same happen by criminalising triple talaq and making the Muslim man vulnerable to the same abuse in the guise of helping the Muslim woman? 6. Social reforms is the need of the hour, it is not just an idea, it is a right. Why did the government not bring in the Womens Reservation Bill instead to ensure empowerment and the protection of these rights? Please click here to read more.