Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21981, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'metaKeywords' => 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21981 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;' $metaKeywords = 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic' | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". The all-round assault..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic".</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21981, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'metaKeywords' => 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21981 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;' $metaKeywords = 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic' | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". The all-round assault..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic".</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818e5204fbf8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21981, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'metaKeywords' => 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21981 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line &#039;unrealistic&#039;' $metaKeywords = 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;. The all-round assault...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as &quot;unrealistic&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. &quot;If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?&quot; he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic' | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". The all-round assault..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic".</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21981, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'', 'metaKeywords' => 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". The all-round assault...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic".</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21981, 'title' => 'Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". </p> <p align="justify"> The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. </p> <p align="justify"> Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. </p> <p align="justify"> Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. </p> <p align="justify"> Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. </p> <p align="justify"> Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function. </p> <p align="justify"> The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. </p> <p align="justify"> The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. </p> <p align="justify"> With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. </p> <p align="justify"> The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. </p> <p align="justify"> However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 July, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Under-attack-Congress-says-poverty-line-unrealistic/articleshow/21413377.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'under-attack-congress-says-poverty-line-039unrealistic039-22129', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22129, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21981 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic'' $metaKeywords = 'poverty estimates,Poverty,Planning Commission,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic". The all-round assault...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Facing allegations of trivializing poverty for tom-tomming Planning Commission figures that show a decline in the number of poor, the Congress changed its tune on Saturday to dub the poverty line as "unrealistic".</p><p align="justify">The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla.</p><p align="justify">Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years.</p><p align="justify">Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16.</p><p align="justify">Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia.</p><p align="justify">Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function.</p><p align="justify">The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor.</p><p align="justify">Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas.</p><p align="justify">The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5.</p><p align="justify">With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise.</p><p align="justify">The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies.</p><p align="justify">Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population.</p><p align="justify">However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Under attack, Congress says poverty line 'unrealistic' |
-The Times of India
The all-round assault on Congress seems to have resulted in the course correction that reflected in the disapprovals issued by Digvijaya Singh, Kapil Sibal and Rajiv Shukla. Union minister Kapil Sibal and AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh questioned the poverty line defined in the recent Planning Commission report that has pegged the number of poor to 21.9% of the population - down from 37.2% over seven years. Minister of state for planning Rajiv Shukla said the Plan panel report has not been accepted by the government and a new committee was examining the issue. He slammed the BJP-led NDA regime for having fixed poverty at a daily earning of Rs 16. Singh tweeted that the criteria for fixing poverty line was too abstract and demanded it be linked to malnourishment and anaemia. Sibal challenged the method of calculating poverty, fixed at monthly salary of Rs 4,080 and Rs 5,000 in rural and urban areas, respectively. "If the Plan panel said those who live above Rs 5,000 a month are not at poverty line, obviously there is something wrong with the definition of poverty in this country. How can anybody live at Rs 5,000?" he asked in a public function. The open questioning of Plan panel figures coincides with a vigorous debate in public domain in which political parties and activists have joined hands to slam the government for mocking the poor. Congress's zealous spokespersons had rushed out to tom tom the figures showing a dip in poverty. The estimate is based on poverty line set at Rs 27 a day per person for rural areas, and Rs 33 a day in urban areas. The spokespersons compounded matters when - responding to attack that the Congress had endorsed an unrealistic definition of poverty for political reasons - they claimed that `hearty meals' could be had for Rs 12 even Rs 5. With election mood warming up, the party seems to lack the stomach for polemics on the politically sensitive issue. On Thursday, AICC spokespersons regretted their statements on cheap meals in a belated damage control exercise. The defensive posture marks a volte-face given that the Congress waved the Plan panel report from party podium to claim credit for bringing down poverty, calling it a result of its inclusive growth policies. Congress thinks the debate on poverty line is misplaced since the government has already divorced the poverty line from entitlements, like the food security law which would cater to 67% of the population. However, there is a realization that debating poverty can be tricky in the prevailing pessimism over economic downturn. |