Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19386
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br /><br />It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br /><br />The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br /><br />The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br /><br />Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br /><br />Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br /><br />Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br /><br />Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br /><br />Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br /><br />Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br /><br />CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19386
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br /><br />It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br /><br />The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br /><br />The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br /><br />Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br /><br />Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br /><br />Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br /><br />Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br /><br />Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br /><br />Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br /><br />CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680480880aa8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680480880aa8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19386,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19522,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19386
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gender,Budget,empowerment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp;amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br /><br />It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br /><br />The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br /><br />The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br /><br />Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br /><br />Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br /><br />Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br /><br />Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br /><br />Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br /><br />Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br /><br />CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 19386,
		'title' => 'Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br />
<br />
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br />
<br />
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br />
<br />
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br />
<br />
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br />
<br />
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br />
<br />
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br />
<br />
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br />
<br />
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br />
<br />
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br />
<br />
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 19522,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 19386,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Gender,Budget,empowerment',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br /><br />It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br /><br />The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br /><br />The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br /><br />Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br /><br />Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br /><br />Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br /><br />Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br /><br />Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br /><br />Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br /><br />CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 19386,
	'title' => 'Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br />
<br />
It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br />
<br />
The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br />
<br />
The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br />
<br />
Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br />
<br />
Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br />
<br />
Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br />
<br />
Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br />
<br />
Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br />
<br />
Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br />
<br />
CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 February, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Union-Budget-no-gender-bender/articleshow/18584677.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'union-budget-no-gender-bender-subodh-varma-19522',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 19522,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 19386
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma'
$metaKeywords = 'Gender,Budget,empowerment'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making.<br /><br />It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change.<br /><br />The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government.<br /><br />The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls.<br /><br />Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said.<br /><br />Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour &amp; Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women.<br /><br />Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said.<br /><br />Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort.<br /><br />Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear.<br /><br />Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces.<br /><br />CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Union Budget no gender bender -Subodh Varma

-The Times of India To remove various disadvantages that women face in India, the Union government introduced Gender Responsive Budgeting (or Gender Budgeting) in 2005-06. It meant that high-flying promises on empowering women were to be backed by financial outlays and that a gender perspective was to imbue all policy making. It was always a tough call - from the home, to the workplace and generally in society women are treated like second class citizens. Over 52 percent women suffer from anaemia, the child sex ratio continues to decline and is now 914, maternal mortality is still high at 212, female work participation is just 26 percent in rural areas and an abysmal 14 percent in urban areas, and crimes against women increased by nearly 30 percent between 2006 and 2010. So, a huge and honest effort was needed to correct this through not just financial outlays but legislation, and deep going social change. The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA), a Delhi based advocacy group that tracks government spending, has found serious shortcomings in the gender budgeting exercise of the central government. The Union Government introduces a Gender Budget Statement (GBS) every year along with the general budget. The GBS captures the total quantum of resources earmarked for women in a financial year. There are two parts to it - Part A reflects those schemes in which 100 percent funds are meant for women and girls and Part B enlists those with at least 30 percent but not the entire amount of funds earmarked for women and girls. Since in many cases no clear cut guidelines exist on how to provide for financial outlays for women, ministries and departments have been playing fast and loose with their reporting. The assumptions behind reporting allocations under Part B of the GBS remain questionable, CBGA said. Central ministries such as Minority Affairs, Earth Sciences, Panchayati Raj and Labour & Employment report 100 percent of their allocations in Part B. This means that they are claiming that all their expenditure is for the benefit of women. Even in Part A, the problem of misreporting persists. For instance, Indira Awas Yojana continues to figure in Part A, despite the fact that 100 percent of its allocations do not benefit women, CBGA said. Many important sectors such as food, finance and water supply do not figure at all in the gender budget statement. In fact only 33 of the 53 ministries and independent departments have any gender budgeting of any sort. Except for the Department of Rural Development and a few other ministries where there are either clear policy guidelines to ensure benefits to women or gender disaggregated data, in most other cases, the assumptions behind reporting funds in Part B of the GBS remain unclear. Specific outlays for curbing violence against women are also listed in the GBS. Spread across five ministries, the government spent only Rs.210.65 cr on such measures as rehabilitation of girl child labour, short stay homes and sensitisation of central police forces. CBGA has recommended that gender budgeting should be made mandatory, details of schemes and beneficiaries should be provided, guidelines and norms should be clearly laid out for each ministry.