Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14016, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14016 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14016, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14016 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810a33ca4047-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14016, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14016 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can&#039;t be done casually: Supreme Court' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp; The apex court said the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after &quot;applying its mind&quot;, the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification,&quot; Justice Lodha writing the judgement said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law,&quot; the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14016, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14016, 'title' => 'Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 1 April, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news-/urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-cant-be-done-casually-supreme-court/articleshow/12490646.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'urgency-plea-for-land-acquisition-can039t-be-done-casually-supreme-court-14139', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14139, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14016 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Urgency plea for land acquisition can't be done casually: Supreme Court |
-PTI Urgency clause can be invoked by the government only in exceptional cases after "applying its mind", the Supreme Court has ruled while quashing acquisition of land by the Delhi administration for a housing project in Rohini. The apex court said the burden of justifying acquisition by invoking the urgency clause under Section 17(1)(4) of Land Acquisition Act solely rests on the government as otherwise it amounts to depriving a person of his or her property. A bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale found fault with Delhi's Lt Governor for acquiring the land at Rohini in April 2000 by dispensing with Section 5A of the Act which mandated that the aggrieved land owners shall be given an opportunity to be heard before their land is acquired. "Where the government invokes urgency power under Section 17(1) and (4) for the public purpose like 'planned development of city or development of residential area' or 'residential scheme', the initial presumption in favour of the government does not arise and the burden lies on the government to prove that the use of power was justified and dispensation of enquiry was necessary. "In the present case the respondents have miserably failed to show to the satisfaction of the court that the power of urgency and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5 A has been exercised with justification," Justice Lodha writing the judgement said. The apex court upheld an appeal filed by Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust challenging acquisition of their land along with others. The trust had contended that it was running a school at the premises. "The action of the Lt Governor, Delhi, in the facts of the case whereby, he directed that the provisions of Section 5A shall not apply, if allowed to stand, it would amount to depriving a person of his property without authority of law," the bench said. |