Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3061, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'metaKeywords' => 'Mining,Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3061 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice' $metaKeywords = 'Mining,Environment' $metaDesc = ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3061, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'metaKeywords' => 'Mining,Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3061 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice' $metaKeywords = 'Mining,Environment' $metaDesc = ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680249fb33b0b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3061, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'metaKeywords' => 'Mining,Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3061 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice' $metaKeywords = 'Mining,Environment' $metaDesc = ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina&rsquo;s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery&rsquo;s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta&rsquo;s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery&rsquo;s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta&rsquo;s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The &ldquo;sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.&rdquo; This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3061, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'metaKeywords' => 'Mining,Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3061, 'title' => 'Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 September, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Vedanta-Alumina-gets-violation-notice/articleshow/6477798.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vedanta-alumina-gets-violation-notice-3148', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3148, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3061 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice' $metaKeywords = 'Mining,Environment' $metaDesc = ' The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Vedanta Alumina gets violation notice |
The environment ministry has issued environmental violation notice to Anil Agarwal-promoted Vedanta Alumina’s Lanjigarh refinery. Violations include failure to adhere to environment protection norms, unauthorised expansion of capacity to 6 million tonnes and sourcing of bauxite from illegal mines. The company has time till September 14 to submit its reply. An unsatisfactory explanation could result in the refinery’s closure. The ministry had, last week, rejected Vedanta’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining project proposed in Niyamgiri Hills citing violation of environment norms. In its latest notice, the ministry has asked Vedanta to explain why environmental clearance given to its 1 million tonne refinery in Lanjigarh should not be revoked and the refinery shut down. In a second notice, the ministry has asked the company to explain why the terms of reference for an environment impact assessment study for the plants expansion should not be withdrawn. Environment minister Jairam Ramesh had on August 24 announced the decision to issue notice to Vedanta for contravening the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The minister had announced that the process of considering an environmental clearance for the refinery’s expansion was being put on hold. The two notices issued by the ministry on Tuesday put Vedanta’s Rs 14,000 crore investment under cloud. In its show cause notice, the ministry has cited reports that the refinery has encroached and enclosed 26 hectares of forest land within its boundary. The plant was given environmental clearance on September 22, 2004, on the condition that it did not require any forest land. Its illegal enclosure of forest land and the construction of a road using forest land invalidate the clearance. The refinery had been allowed to go ahead with production even before the issue of linked bauxite mine had been settled. The refinery has been sourcing bauxite from 14 mines, of which only 1 has environmental clearance, two others have been granted terms of reference to undertake environmental impact assessment. The remaining 11 mines are illegal. This is a clear contravention. Additionally, the plant has not put in place the requisite ground water quality monitoring mechanism. Its fugitive emissions in the lime and coal handling area are not up to the mark. The second notice deals with the unauthorised expansion of the refinery. The company has gone in for a six-fold expansion of the refinery from a production capacity of 1 million tonne to 6 million tonnes per annum. Vedanta had filed for an application for expansion in August 2007. The terms of reference for a detailed impact assessment study was given in February 2008. The final report was submitted by the company in June 2009. However, the environment appraisal committee had asked for additional details. It had also undertaken a site visit, which after several postponements took place in July 2010. The “sub committee of the expert appraisal committee found substantial construction for the expansion proposal.” This was verified by the Saxena Committee in its report of August 2010. The expansion proposal is yet to be cleared by the environment appraisal committee. |