Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e794942069-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17338, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,crime', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17338 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,crime' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e794942069-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17338, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,crime', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17338 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,crime' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e794942069-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e794942069-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e794942069-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17338, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,crime', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17338 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as &#039;federal crimes&#039;-Aman Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,crime' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. &quot;Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences,&quot; the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17338, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,crime', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17338, 'title' => 'Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 October, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-federal-crimes/articleshow/16732167.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'views-of-states-sought-to-treat-terrorism-and-organised-crime-as-039federal-crimes039-aman-sharma-17466', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17466, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17338 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,crime' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Views of states sought to treat terrorism and organised crime as 'federal crimes'-Aman Sharma |
-The Economic Times The home ministry has sought the opinion of all states on whether offences like terrorism and organised crime can be treated as federal frames. It has forwarded the 5th Report of the second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) to states, asking for their comments on each of the 152 recommendations that relate to state governments. This report, submitted to the government in June 2007, is among the only two reports out of the 15 submitted by ARC on which there has been so far no consultation with states. Several states are already miffed with MHA for pushing the National Counter Terrorism Centre project that plans to empower the Centre to take action on its own against terror plots in any state. Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has promised to consult chief ministers on NCTC, formulated during the tenure of his predecessor, before going ahead with it. The timing of seeking comments on the said ARC report could lead to more confrontation between MHA and states. States have been asked to comment on the recommendation to re-examine certain offences which have interstate or national ramification and include them in a new federal law for probe by a specialised agency. "Offences that may be included in this category are organised crime, terrorism, acts threatening national security, trafficking in arms or human beings, sedition, major crimes with inter-state ramifications, assassination of (including attempts on) major public figures and serious economic offences," the report said. Right now, there is no definition of 'federal crime' in the Indian Penal Code. Since 'public order' and 'police' figure in List II (State List) in the 7th Schedule of Constitution, the ARC recommendations involve constitutional issues having ramifications on Centre-state relations. Another contentious ARC recommendation on which the view of states has been sought by MHA is if a law should be enacted to empower the Centre to deploy forces and to even direct it in case of major public order problems that may lead to the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in state. ARC recommended that such deployment should take place only if the state concerned fails to act under the Article 256 of the Constitution and that such deployments should be only for three months, unless an extension is authorised by Parliament. Right now, central forces can be deployed in any state only on the request of the respective state government who directs the forces too. States have also been asked for their views on the ARC recommendation to scrap the provision of seeking sanction from the Centre or the state government for prosecuting people accused of inciting riots or communal offences or making hate speeches under Section 153 (A) of Indian Penal Code. ARC also recommended that prosecution in cases related to rioting or communal offences should not be sought to be withdrawn. States will also have to give their views now on the ARC recommendation that commissions of inquiry into any major riots/violence should give their report within a year and government should make public the reason if it does not accept any recommendation of such a commission. This ARC report also suggested that confessions made before the police by an accused should be admissible evidence in court, if the confession is video-taped in the presence of the family member or lawyer of the accused, and if the accused is subsequently produced in court. States will also have to consider another ARC recommendation which said that victims of a crime must have a right to object to the bail plea or parole application of an accused person.
|