Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13702, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'metaKeywords' => 'Budget,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13702 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear' $metaKeywords = 'Budget,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13702, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'metaKeywords' => 'Budget,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13702 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear' $metaKeywords = 'Budget,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680395f3a521e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680395f3a521e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13702, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'metaKeywords' => 'Budget,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13702 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear' $metaKeywords = 'Budget,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13702, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'metaKeywords' => 'Budget,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13702, 'title' => 'Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear/articleshow/12336274.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'vodafone-like-transactions-should-yield-tax-and-the-law-must-make-that-clear-13825', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13825, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13702 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear' $metaKeywords = 'Budget,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Vodafone-like transactions should yield tax and the law must make that clear |
-The Economic Times The Budget's retrospective clarification of what is meant by transfer of assets in India entailing a capital gains tax payment is controversial but necessary and unavoidable. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone and against the government in the company's disputation of a capital gains tax claim in its acquisition of Hutch-Essar. This is on ground that might be legally firm but is quicksand for logic. The Court said that Indian tax laws privilege form over content, that they mandate the government to look at, rather than look through, a transaction entailing transfer of assets. At the level of form, Hutch sold its shares in an overseas company to an overseas Vodafone subsidiary and, if one does not look beyond form, there is no case for Indian tax authorities to raise a claim on an overseas transfer of overseas assets. But if one asks why the transaction took place and why the overseas company was worth anything at all, the picture changes. Vodafone bought the overseas company and paid good money for it because it controlled Hutch-Essar, a dominant player in the world's most dynamic telecom market. Now, what gives a government the right to tax anything at all? Tax is the price people pay for the state's multiple services that together enable civilised existence and prosperous commerce. Hutch-Essar became a valuable company thanks to a variety of policies (including allocation of cheap spectrum) and innovative business practices allowed by overall policy and regulation. When such a company is sold and generates capital gains, and India has a policy of taxing capital gains, why should the transaction not yield tax to India? Because of the form of the transaction, says the Court. This is a conclusion that defies logic but might be warranted because of lack of clarity in the intent of the law. Budget 2012 seeks to supply the needed clarification on the intent of the law, so that form would no longer prevail over substance. This makes for firm, even if dour, clarity on the subject. And that is wholly welcome from the point of view of domestic and foreign investors. Vodafone had received a tax notice before it made its final payment. So prior ignorance was no excuse.
|