Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8598
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br /></em><br />A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br /><br />At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br /><br />At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br /><br />At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br /><br />At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br /><br />Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br /><br />It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br /><br />The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br /><br />The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8598
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br /></em><br />A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br /><br />At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br /><br />At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br /><br />At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br /><br />At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br /><br />Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br /><br />It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br /><br />The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br /><br />The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f7c8ab792-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8598,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8699,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8598
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Report is now dead, says Congress &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee&#039;s contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &amp;ldquo;dead&amp;rdquo; as it was &amp;ldquo;returned&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &amp;ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&amp;rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &amp;ldquo;status of the report.&amp;rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &amp;ldquo;unfinished&amp;rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar&#039;s letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &amp;ldquo;unfinished work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &amp;ldquo;rejected&amp;rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Tuesday&#039;s meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PAC&#039;s last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br /></em><br />A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br /><br />At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br /><br />At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br /><br />At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br /><br />At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br /><br />Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br /><br />It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br /><br />The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br /><br />The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8598,
		'title' => 'War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<em><br />
</em>
<div align="justify">
<em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br />
</em><br />
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br />
<br />
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br />
<br />
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br />
<br />
At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br />
<br />
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br />
<br />
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br />
<br />
The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8699,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8598,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption',
	'metaDesc' => '


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft...',
	'disp' => '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br /></em><br />A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br /><br />At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br /><br />At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br /><br />At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br /><br />At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br /><br />Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br /><br />It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br /><br />The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br /><br />The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8598,
	'title' => 'War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<em><br />
</em>
<div align="justify">
<em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br />
</em><br />
A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br />
<br />
At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br />
<br />
At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br />
<br />
At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br />
<br />
It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br />
<br />
The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br />
<br />
The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 29 June, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/29/stories/2011062962830100.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'war-of-words-over-2g-report-at-pac-again-by-neena-vyas-8699',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8699,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8598
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas'
$metaKeywords = 'Corruption'
$metaDesc = '


Report is now dead, says Congress 

A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft...'
$disp = '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>Report is now dead, says Congress <br /></em><br />A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was &ldquo;dead&rdquo; as it was &ldquo;returned&rdquo; and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration.<br /><br />At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult &ldquo;legal and constitutional experts&rdquo; as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the &ldquo;status of the report.&rdquo; It was also pointed out that the &ldquo;unfinished&rdquo; work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice.<br /><br />At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an &ldquo;unfinished work.&rdquo;<br /><br />At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and &ldquo;rejected&rdquo; it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker.<br /><br />At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again.<br /><br />Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified.<br /><br />It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either.<br /><br />The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it.<br /><br />The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

War of words over 2G report at PAC again by Neena Vyas

Report is now dead, says Congress A war of words broke out at the first meeting of the newly constituted Public Accounts Committee (PAC) here on Tuesday. While some members were vociferous in their view that the committee's contentious draft report on the 2G spectrum allocation scam was “dead” as it was “returned” and “rejected” by the Lok Sabha Speaker for lack of proper procedure in its adoption, others felt the new committee could again take it up for consideration. At the end of a couple of hours of heated exchanges, committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi said he would consult “legal and constitutional experts” as well as those familiar with parliamentary procedures and look at the past precedence, if any, to arrive at a conclusion on the “status of the report.” It was also pointed out that the “unfinished” work of the previous committee was routinely carried forward by the new committee, and this was the standard practice. At the outset, Dr. Joshi placed before the committee Speaker Meira Kumar's letter, informing him of her decision to return the report he submitted two months earlier. She had noted that proper procedure for adopting the report was not followed and it was an “unfinished work.” At that time, 11 of the 21 members of the committee had given it in writing to the Speaker that the chairman tried to rush through the report and they, the majority, opposed and “rejected” it. Dr. Joshi, nevertheless, submitted the report to the Speaker. At Tuesday's meeting, Congress members Jayanti Natarajan, Sanjay Nirupam, K.S. Rao and Girija Vyas said the report was now dead and could not be taken up afresh. Furthermore, the issue was before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they noted. Some others, mostly from the BJP, said that as the Speaker had faulted the adoption procedure, the report could be properly adopted by the new committee submitted to her again. Interestingly, DMK MP Adhi Sankar felt the report could be taken up again, but A. Raja and some other key players in the case were not called as witnesses by the last committee. This was a major flaw that must be rectified. It was reported that the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party MPs, who earlier joined hands with the Congress, distanced themselves from the party this time. But they were not in tune with the BJP either. The DMK and the BSP wanted the report circulated, but the Congress opposed it. The PAC's last meeting on April 28 witnessed chaotic scenes, with members accusing each other of violating the procedures and indulging in politics instead of working without bias to arrive at the truth. Dr. Joshi abruptly ended the meeting when the Congress members and their supporters demanded a vote on the report.