Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Development,Human Development,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan' $metaKeywords = 'Human Development,Human Development,Health' $metaDesc = ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Development,Human Development,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan' $metaKeywords = 'Human Development,Human Development,Health' $metaDesc = ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7b25339ae9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Development,Human Development,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan' $metaKeywords = 'Human Development,Human Development,Health' $metaDesc = ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil &mdash; the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India&rsquo;s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India&rsquo;s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states &mdash; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 &mdash; meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered &ldquo;global models&rdquo; for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,&rdquo; says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures &mdash; which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, &lsquo;Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)&rsquo; aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,&rdquo; explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the &ldquo;motivator&rdquo; and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. &ldquo;Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,&rdquo; notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Development,Human Development,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2425, 'title' => 'We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/we-the-116-crore-people/644248/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'we-the-116-crore-people-by-vidya-krishnan-2509', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2509, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan' $metaKeywords = 'Human Development,Human Development,Health' $metaDesc = ' Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world. As yet another World Population Day...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Every year, India adds the population of Australia to its already staggering ranks of 116.1 crore people. Every 10 years, we add the population of Brazil — the fifth most populous country in the world.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >“There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ><em>Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness</em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry).</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
We, the 116 crore people by Vidya Krishnan |
As yet another World Population Day comes around on July 11, and India stands poised to eclipse China as the most populous country of the world, the government is gingerly attempting to bring incentive-based family planning back into focus. While the first attempt three decades back had run into controversy, there is a growing realisation that if unchecked, India’s population trend would negate any attempt at sustainable development. Following the controversy generated by the 1970s sterilisation programme implemented by the Indira Gandhi government, the Family Planning Programme had been renamed National Population Control Programme. A National Population Stabilisation Fund (PSF) or Jansankhya Stirtha Kosh was formed in 2006, though sterilisation remained a touchy subject. The undoing of India’s population stabilisation measures lies, according to experts, with two states — Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. According to the Health Ministry, only half of the Indian states, i.e. 14, have achieved the Millennium Development Goal of two children per mother by 2015. An average Indian woman has a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of 2.68 — meaning she is likely to have three children during her child-bearing years. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, that number is four. Southern states, especially Andhra Pradesh, are an exception, considered “global models” for their efforts at population control. “Even Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have managed to bring down fertility rates. (On the other hand) a woman born in UP or Bihar is likely to have four children, be uneducated and likely to die during childbirth. Family planning cannot be an isolated cause anymore. Larger families are a result of illiteracy, lack of access to healthcare and it affects maternal and child health. We are now devising policies keeping in mind all these factors,” says Dr Amarjit Singh, Executive Director, PSF. For the first time, the government has also roped in private practitioners as part of its population control measures — which in itself is a huge departure from the usual mistrust between government and private doctors. Chiranjeevi: Long life starts at childbirth According to a State of Mothers Report, 2010, by Save the children, India is among the worst places in the world to be a mother. It ranks first among the 12 countries which account for two-thirds of the under-five and maternal deaths in the world. Government statistics show that a majority of the women in BIMARU states are married between the ages of 15 and 17, are anaemic and unprepared for childbirth. Anaemic mothers then give birth to malnourished, underweight children. An innovative joint venture, ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (Plan for a long life)’ aims to check that by providing BPL women who do not opt for institutional deliveries access to skilled emergency, gynaecological and obstetric care free of cost. Under the scheme, the government signs MoUs with private practitioners specialising in gynaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics, paying an advance of Rs 25,000 for upgradation of their clinics. “There is usually a lot of mistrust when it comes to government reimbursing the expenses. We pay them in advance and treat them as government doctors when they are treating Below Poverty Line women. In case of legal claims, the government represents the private doctors,” explains Dr Singh of the PSF. The pilot project was launched in 2005 in five Gujarat districts. After a costing exercise carried out by the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Ahmedabad, and detailed consultations with Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), the Gujarat government fixed the prices per procedure. The scheme proved remarkably successful in halting and reversing maternal and infant mortality rates in the pilot districts, and has since been expanded to all 25 districts of Gujarat. The results have been startling: maternal mortality has gone down from 389/1 lakh child births in 1989 to 100 in 2010 in the state. Infant mortality rate is down from 54 per 1,000 births in 2006 to 50 in 2009. The states of West Bengal and Bihar have also initiated the scheme while the Union government is looking to expand it to all BIMARU states. Currently, 869 doctors are a part of Chiranjeevi. In the past four years, they have delivered over 5,00,000 children who otherwise would have been born at home. Besides institutional deliveries, the scheme provides incentives for sterilisation and vaccination of newborns. An off-shoot in Gujarat is the fall in numbers of Caesarean deliveries, since doctors get paid at C-sec rates even for a normal delivery. Santushti: Sterilisation as key to happiness AN off-shoot of the Chiranjeevi programme, Santushti was launched in 2008 to address the extremely sensitive issue of sterilisation. The basis of the programme, which focuses on sterilisation operations through joint ventures, is heavy monetary incentives to private doctors (the “motivator” and the person undergoing sterilisation already get a monetary incentive from the Health Ministry). Under it, the government gives private sector gynaecologists and vasectomy surgeons an opportunity to conduct sterilisation operations in a Public Private Partnership. A surgeon receives Rs 1,500 per vasectomy/tubectomy. Similar to the Chiranjeevi scheme, the government gives an advance of Rs 15,000 as soon as an MoU is signed. If a clinic holds a camp for sterilisation, an extra Rs 500 is given per patient. “Since the schemes, we have had over 6,000 surgeries in four states. This was otherwise an unthinkable target,” notes Dr Singh. The scheme is functioning in Rajasthan, MP, Orissa and Bihar. |