Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16599, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16599 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16599, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16599 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330acf1a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16599, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16599 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court&rsquo;s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: &ldquo;You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri &ldquo;What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. &ldquo;more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16599, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16599, 'title' => 'What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3809459.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'what-have-you-done-to-save-tigers-court-asks-centre-j-venkatesan-16727', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16727, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16599 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Biodiversity,Environment,Forests' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
What have you done to save tigers, court asks Centre-J Venkatesan |
-The Hindu Interim ban on tourism activities in reserves will continue Even as it extended its interim order banning tourist activities in the core areas of tiger reserves, the Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Centre for inaction on protecting the tiger population. A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar extended the ban when Wasim A. Qadri, counsel for the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drew the court’s attention to its fresh affidavit filed on Tuesday for review of the July 24 ban order. Justice Kumar told counsel: “You are trying to make up. You give a report [to this court] after due deliberations. We want to know on what basis you did it. What was the data available with you? What do you mean by the Tiger project? What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier, it [tiger population] was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about commercial activities than saving the tiger population.” The court had passed the ban order acting on a petition filed by conservationist Ajay Dubey. On Wednesday, besides the NTCA, several States and others filed applications for lifting the ban. Justice Kumar told Mr. Qadri “What have you done for the tiger project? What about the core areas you have promised to take steps for? The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits. Why did you initially recommend the ban?” Counsel said the Centre received several representations from States seeking a review of the ban. The Bench, while posting further hearing to August 29, made it clear to counsel that it needed answers on the points it raised. The July 24 interim order would continue. In its affidavit, the Centre contended that States had expressed concern that banning tourism would result in loss of income to locals depending on tourism, leading to discontent, which, in turn, might become a threat to wildlife and forests. The additional affidavit, jointly filed by the NTCA and the Ministry, said the earlier guidelines framed by the Authority, on the basis of which the court imposed the interim ban, needed to be reviewed. Following pressure from the States, the Centre sought permission to review the guidelines, issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, asking them to ban all tourism activities in the core areas of tiger reserve forests. Govt. “more worried about commercial activities than saving tiger population” Why did you recommend ban in the first place, asks Bench
|