Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15485
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


It won't stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br /><br />The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br /><br />Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br /><br />The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br /><br />He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br /><br />When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br /><br />When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15485
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


It won't stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br /><br />The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br /><br />Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br /><br />The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br /><br />He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br /><br />When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br /><br />When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f8b3f7a5e8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15485,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15612,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15485
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Minority,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It won&#039;t stay A.P. High Court order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &amp;ldquo;complex&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sensitive&amp;rdquo; issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court expressed its &amp;ldquo;unhappiness&amp;rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &amp;ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &amp;ldquo;blame on his shoulders&amp;rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &amp;ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &amp;ldquo;We will not order stay.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &amp;ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&amp;rdquo; said &amp;ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&amp;rdquo; the bench said adding that &amp;ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&amp;rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


It won't stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br /><br />The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br /><br />Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br /><br />The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br /><br />He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br /><br />When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br /><br />When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 15485,
		'title' => 'What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
<em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br />
</em><br />
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br />
<br />
The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br />
<br />
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br />
<br />
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br />
<br />
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br />
<br />
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br />
<br />
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 15612,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 15485,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Minority,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
-PTI


&nbsp;


It won't stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br /><br />The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br /><br />Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br /><br />The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br /><br />He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br /><br />When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br /><br />When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 15485,
	'title' => 'What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
<em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br />
</em><br />
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br />
<br />
The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br />
<br />
Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br />
<br />
The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br />
<br />
When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br />
<br />
The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br />
<br />
When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3515141.ece?homepage=true',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'what-is-the-basis-for-minority-quota-asks-supreme-court-15612',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 15612,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 15485
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court'
$metaKeywords = 'Minority,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI


&nbsp;


It won't stay A.P. High Court order

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>It won't stay A.P. High Court order<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the &ldquo;complex&rdquo; and &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; issue.<br /><br />The apex court expressed its &ldquo;unhappiness&rdquo; that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation.<br /><br />Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday.<br /><br />The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order &ldquo;unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Attorney General started submissions by taking the &ldquo;blame on his shoulders&rdquo; for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the &ldquo;argument was not the most brilliant.&rdquo;<br /><br />He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling.<br /><br />When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, &ldquo;We will not order stay.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,&rdquo; the Bench said.<br /><br />The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities.<br /><br />When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the &ldquo;High Court has gone completely wrong,&rdquo; said &ldquo;when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],&rdquo; the bench said adding that &ldquo;where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.&rdquo; When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

What is the basis for minority quota, asks Supreme Court

-PTI   It won't stay A.P. High Court order The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Andhra Pradesh High Court order that quashed 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in central educational institutions such as the IITs, and ticked off the government for the way it had handled the “complex” and “sensitive” issue. The apex court expressed its “unhappiness” that the Centre was blaming the High Court when it had itself failed to produce documents to support its case. A Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar was critical of the Ministry of Human Resource Development rushing to the apex court with the appeal against the May 28 order of the High Court without documents to justify the policy of carving out 4.5 per cent sub-quota within the 27 per cent OBC reservation. Without issuing any notice, the Bench asked Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati to produce before it the supporting documents on the issue by Tuesday and posted the matter for hearing to Wednesday. The Bench said it cannot stay the High Court order “unless the government produces material to show a detailed exercise was undertaken to carve out the sub-quota.” The Attorney General started submissions by taking the “blame on his shoulders” for the outcome of the sub-quota policy in the High Court by saying that the “argument was not the most brilliant.” He sought some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs for which 325 candidates had qualified for it under the 4.5 per cent sub quota and their career and future could be jeopardised if they are not allowed to appear for the counselling. When Mr. Vahanvati said there was need for some protection in view of the ongoing counselling for IITs, the Bench said, “We will not order stay.” “First of all you have not produced any documents in the High Court. We would have been happy, if you had done so,” the Bench said. The Bench wanted to know from Mr. Vahanvati as to what was the basis and how did the government determine 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities. When he sought to point out errors in the High Court order, the Bench said it was natural for the High Court to ask questions on which the Centre was complaining. The Bench, which was not in agreement with Mr. Vahanvati that the “High Court has gone completely wrong,” said “when the December 22, 2011 Office Memorandum (OM) (on 4.5 per cent sub-quota) reflected nothing, the High Court will ask questions.” “Without placing documents, how can you find fault with the High Court [order],” the bench said adding that “where is the material and the High Court says nothing is produced.” When Mr. Vahanvati said the High Court also missed the 1993 notification on caste identification, the Bench wanted to know whether it was placed before it or not.