Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34151, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka', 'metaDesc' => ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34151 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra' $metaKeywords = 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka' $metaDesc = ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />“We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34151, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka', 'metaDesc' => ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34151 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra' $metaKeywords = 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka' $metaDesc = ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />“We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681174ba81a01-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681174ba81a01-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34151, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka', 'metaDesc' => ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34151 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra' $metaKeywords = 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka' $metaDesc = ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre&rsquo;s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre&rsquo;s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre&rsquo;s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management&mdash;which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow&mdash;the &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought category has been deleted in the new manual.&nbsp; It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as &lsquo;normal&rsquo; and &lsquo;severe&rsquo;. Only in case of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre&rsquo;s assistance even if they suffered &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought. Although the new norms don&rsquo;t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under &rsquo;moderate&rsquo; category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka&rsquo;s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. &ldquo;Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre&rsquo;s assistance as they do not come under new definition of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought,&rdquo; says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle &lsquo;moderate drought&rsquo;. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is &lsquo;severe&rsquo; in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a &lsquo;Manual for Drought Management&rsquo; in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; drought and approach the Union government only for cases of &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,&rdquo; says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. &ldquo;The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,&rdquo; says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under &lsquo;severe&rsquo; drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought:&nbsp; rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn&rsquo;t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />“We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> “We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34151, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka', 'metaDesc' => ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />“We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34151, 'title' => 'Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Down to Earth<br /> <br /> <em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /> </em><br /> Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /> <br /> New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /> <br /> The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /> <br /> The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> <em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /> </em><br /> Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /> <br /> The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /> <br /> The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /> <br /> C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /> <br /> “We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /> <br /> The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /> <br /> Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /> <br /> The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Down to Earth, 6 July, 2017, http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought-jitendra-4682254', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682254, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34151 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra' $metaKeywords = 'Rainfall Deficit,drought,karnataka' $metaDesc = ' -Down to Earth New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Down to Earth<br /><br /><em>New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states <br /></em><br />Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF).<br /><br />New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems.<br /><br />The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought.<br /><br />The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><em>Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria<br /></em><br />Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone.<br /><br />The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent.<br /><br />The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years.<br /><br />C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre.<br /><br />“We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu.<br /><br />The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive.<br /><br />Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category.<br /><br />The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229" title="http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/why-is-karnataka-protesting-change-in-definition-of-drought--58229">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Why is Karnataka protesting change in definition of drought? -Jitendra |
-Down to Earth
New norms for declaring drought are too stringent to be practical and are indicative of Centre’s intention to pass on the financial burden to states Karnataka government has opposed Centre’s move to change parameters for drought assessment. The new manual for drought management limits Centre’s scope to offer financial assistance to states in the eventuality of drought. Unlike the 2009 manual for drought management—which was a mere guideline and not mandatory for the states to follow—the ‘moderate’ drought category has been deleted in the new manual. It means drought-hit areas will now be categorised as ‘normal’ and ‘severe’. Only in case of ‘severe’ drought, a state would be eligible for central assistance from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF). New conditions included in the norms will make it more difficult for the states to prove ‘severe’ drought and get relief from the Centre as the yardstick to measure severity of drought has been made stricter. This is a double whammy for most of the states as they lack drought early warning systems. The previous norms were supportive of states as they could get Centre’s assistance even if they suffered ‘moderate’ drought. Although the new norms don’t prevent states to put a drought-hit region under ’moderate’ category, the states, however, will have to pay for the relief from their own pocket. The Centre has absolved itself from the responsibility of providing assistance to states in case of ‘moderate’ drought. The new norms, which are mandatory in nature, were formulated based on the direction of the Supreme Court. Karnataka’s objection to stringent criteria Karnataka agriculture minister Krishna Byre Gowda alleges that the Centre has unilaterally changed norms for assistance from NDRF without consulting the states. “Most of the districts in Karnataka will not be considered for Centre’s assistance as they do not come under new definition of ‘severe’ drought,” says Gowda, while talking to Down To Earth over phone. The reason behind registering a protest is a visible attempt from the Centre to steer clear of the liability of providing relief to tackle ‘moderate drought’. Also, the technical criteria to show that drought is ‘severe’ in nature have been made more stringent. The Centre had issued a ‘Manual for Drought Management’ in December 2016. The manual made it clear that states have to spend from its exchequer to tackle ‘moderate’ drought and approach the Union government only for cases of ‘severe’ drought. In response, Karnataka submitted a memorandum, pointing out anomalies in the norms that would affect states in the coming years. C N Prabhu, scientist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC), who analysed the manual in details, says this is going to be the first year under new norms. Hence, other states are yet to come up with their memoranda to the Centre. “We have studied new norms in details as Karnataka is the only state which has weather and disaster monitoring infrastructure at panchayat level,” says Prabhu. According to him, the new norms are technically extensive and also binding. “The previous manual on drought management was just drought-related guidelines and not mandatory for the states to follow. They introduced cumbersome processes which hardly helped farmers,” says Prabhu. The new manual, which adopted standard practices from across the world, gives six parameters for declaration of drought. These categories of indices are Rainfall, Vegetation, Hydrological indices, Crops situation indices, ground verification and others. These six indices are further elaborated into more than 13 sub-points, making it technically extensive. Except rainfall and ground verification, all other indices are considered impact indicators. To come under ‘severe’ drought category, a state has to prove severity in three out of these four impact indicators. Even if two indicators suggest severity of drought, the state would be shifted to ‘normal’ category. The 2009 manual had four parameters to assess drought: rainfall deficiency, extent of area sown, normalised difference vegetation index and moisture adequacy index. These parameters left much scope for manipulation. For instance, in 2016, Bihar government didn’t declare drought despite severe rain deficit and subsequent crop loss in most of the districts. It did only after the direction from Supreme Court. Please click here to read more. |