Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26759
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


&nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p><p align="justify"><em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br /></em></p><p align="justify">In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.</p><p align="justify">The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.</p><p align="justify">The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.</p><p align="justify">The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.</p><p align="justify">In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.</p><p align="justify"><em>Drastic changes</em></p><p align="justify">After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.</p><p align="justify">In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.</p><p align="justify">The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.</p><p align="justify">As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.</p><p align="justify">As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.</p><p align="justify"><em>High costs</em></p><p align="justify">The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.</p><p align="justify">This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.</p><p align="justify">In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.</p><p align="justify">The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26759
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


&nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p><p align="justify"><em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br /></em></p><p align="justify">In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.</p><p align="justify">The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.</p><p align="justify">The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.</p><p align="justify">The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.</p><p align="justify">In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.</p><p align="justify"><em>Drastic changes</em></p><p align="justify">After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.</p><p align="justify">In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.</p><p align="justify">The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.</p><p align="justify">As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.</p><p align="justify">As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.</p><p align="justify"><em>High costs</em></p><p align="justify">The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.</p><p align="justify">This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.</p><p align="justify">In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.</p><p align="justify">The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8aa8d3d1d6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26759,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26759
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;subsidies,fertilizers,Urea&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


&amp;nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drastic changes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the CAG&#039;s performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers&#039; Annual Report of 2008-09.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;High costs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &amp;lsquo;Made in India&#039; will once again remain a politician&#039;s paper promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is a journalist and author of &amp;lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


&nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p><p align="justify"><em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br /></em></p><p align="justify">In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.</p><p align="justify">The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.</p><p align="justify">The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.</p><p align="justify">The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.</p><p align="justify">In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.</p><p align="justify"><em>Drastic changes</em></p><p align="justify">After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.</p><p align="justify">In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.</p><p align="justify">The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.</p><p align="justify">As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.</p><p align="justify">As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.</p><p align="justify"><em>High costs</em></p><p align="justify">The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.</p><p align="justify">This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.</p><p align="justify">In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.</p><p align="justify">The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 26759,
		'title' => 'Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line
</div>
<p align="justify">
&nbsp;
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br />
</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>Drastic changes</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>High costs</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em>
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4674802,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 26759,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen',
	'metaKeywords' => 'subsidies,fertilizers,Urea',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu Business Line


&nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p><p align="justify"><em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br /></em></p><p align="justify">In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.</p><p align="justify">The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.</p><p align="justify">The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.</p><p align="justify">The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.</p><p align="justify">In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.</p><p align="justify"><em>Drastic changes</em></p><p align="justify">After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.</p><p align="justify">In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.</p><p align="justify">The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.</p><p align="justify">As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.</p><p align="justify">As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.</p><p align="justify"><em>High costs</em></p><p align="justify">The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.</p><p align="justify">This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.</p><p align="justify">In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.</p><p align="justify">The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em></p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 26759,
	'title' => 'Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line
</div>
<p align="justify">
&nbsp;
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br />
</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The production cost of urea at MFL was ₹46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was ₹8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was ₹18,016 crore in 2012-13.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>Drastic changes</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of ₹157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to ₹2030 crore.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of ₹14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched ₹32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>High costs</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to ₹17,061 crore, higher than the ₹16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This is despite the fact that imports at ₹44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was ₹37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em>
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 14 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/why-no-make-in-india-for-urea/article6691060.ece?homepage=true',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'why-no-make-in-india-for-urea-sandip-sen-4674802',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4674802,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 26759
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen'
$metaKeywords = 'subsidies,fertilizers,Urea'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu Business Line


&nbsp;


The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies



In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p><p align="justify"><em>The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies<br /></em></p><p align="justify">In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal.</p><p align="justify">The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum.</p><p align="justify">The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected.</p><p align="justify">The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines.</p><p align="justify">In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13.</p><p align="justify"><em>Drastic changes</em></p><p align="justify">After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC.</p><p align="justify">In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore.</p><p align="justify">The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004.</p><p align="justify">As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne.</p><p align="justify">As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09.</p><p align="justify"><em>High costs</em></p><p align="justify">The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF.</p><p align="justify">This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser.</p><p align="justify">Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product.</p><p align="justify">In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports.</p><p align="justify">The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. &lsquo;Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is a journalist and author of &lsquo;Neta, Babu and Subsidy'</em></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Why no ‘Make in India’ for urea? -Sandip Sen

-The Hindu Business Line   The closure of three urea producing plants in south India has led to a sharp spike in imports and subsidies In April 2014, the UPA government in its last days, cut off the lifeline of three urea plants. It gave a final push to a ten-year-old trend of replacing domestic urea production with imports. The government-owned Madras Fertilisers, and the private sector units SPIC and MCF closed down six months later because the Department of Fertiliser (DoF) under the Modi Government went ahead with the UPA proposal. The above closure would result in additional imports of 20,000 tonnes of fertiliser per annum. The naphtha feedstock consumed by the fertiliser units was being domestically produced by the nearby Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd (CPCL). CPCL and IOC units acting as suppliers to these urea plants were adversely affected. The production cost of urea at MFL was 46,000 per MT at the time of its closure which, though higher than domestically produced gas based urea, was lower than the landed price of imported fertiliser. Though MFL had changed over to gas-based production as per the direction of the DOF it could not get gas due to delays by Government agencies in laying gas pipelines. In 2004, when the UPA came to power India was totally self sufficient in production of urea with no imports. The subsidy on locally produced urea was 8521 crore that year. Today, India imports over a quarter of the urea it uses. The imported urea is not cheap. It is, in fact, far more expensive than the urea produced by the naphtha based plants but is heavily subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy on urea imports was 18,016 crore in 2012-13. Drastic changes After the UPA came to power it changed the policy to import and subsidise urea. A key beneficiary of this import policy was Indian Potash Limited IPL, a small private sector company, a third of whose shares were held by Iffco, one of the largest producers of urea. Iffco had become a privately owned co-operative after it returned the equity invested by the central government of 157 crore, permitted under the amended Multi Co-operative Society Act in 2003. IPL was also privately owned but surprisingly enjoys rights given to public sector importers MMTC and STC. In May 2007, the Secretary, Department of Fertiliser (DoF), asked States to give 100 per cent advance to IPL to import fertilisers despite it being a privately owned company. IPL was bestowed interest free advances of several thousand crore and its balance sheet showed a three fold rise of loan funds to 2030 crore. The debt equity ratio of IPL with a meagre equity base of 14.3 crores shot up to over 15:1 the next year but it was still given bank guarantees by public sector banks to import fertiliser as a result of which its turnover touched 32,154 crores in 2008-09 nearly three times the previous year and twenty times its revenue before the UPA tweaked the fertiliser import policy in 2004. As per the CAG's performance audit, IPL imported 18 lakh tonnes of urea between July 2008 to January 2009 on government account at prices of up to $850 /tonne. As India became the largest importer globally it spiked international prices of urea that had remained dormant for the last twenty years. FOB Urea prices which were $280.75 per tonne in January 2007 rose to $403.75 in January 2008 and $815 in August 2008 as per Department of Fertilisers' Annual Report of 2008-09. High costs The imports by IPL were at prohibitively high prices but were subsidised by the Finance Ministry. As a matter of fact imported urea continues to be heavily subsidised . The subsidy on imported urea amounted to 17,061 crore, higher than the 16796 crore subsidy for domestically produced urea, according to the 2011-12 annual report of the DoF. This is despite the fact that imports at 44.92 lakh MT was a just third of the domestic production of 122.59 lakh tonnes of the nitrogenous fertiliser. Calculations show that subsidy per tonne that year on the imported nutrient was 37,980 as against 13,700 on the indigenously produced product. In first two months of the year 2014 urea imports doubled to 14.9 lakh tonnes against 6.56 lakh tonnes in the April-May period of last year. This closure of naphtha based urea plants in South India will further boost imports. The higher cost of imports will again be subsidised by the Finance Ministry. The subsidy is given not only on imported nutrient but on port handling, bagging and transporting the product. ‘Made in India' will once again remain a politician's paper promise. The writer is a journalist and author of ‘Neta, Babu and Subsidy'