Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20687
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.</p><p align="justify">A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.</p><p align="justify">The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?</p><p align="justify">The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20687
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.</p><p align="justify">A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.</p><p align="justify">The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?</p><p align="justify">The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24eee08129-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24eee08129-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20687,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20832,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20687
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency&#039;s status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &amp;quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven&#039;t the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.</p><p align="justify">A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.</p><p align="justify">The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?</p><p align="justify">The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 20687,
		'title' => '“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 20832,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 20687,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.</p><p align="justify">A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.</p><p align="justify">The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?</p><p align="justify">The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 20687,
	'title' => '“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive/article4671222.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'why-was-court-not-told-draft-was-shared-with-executive-j-venkatesan-20832',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 20832,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 20687
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'coal mines,Mining,Law and Justice,Corruption,CBI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu



The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.


A Bench of...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials.</p><p align="justify">A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the &quot;report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all.</p><p align="justify">The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person?</p><p align="justify">The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

“Why was court not told draft was shared with executive?”-J Venkatesan

-The Hindu The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the CBI Director to file an affidavit explaining why in the agency's status report dated March 8 no disclosure was made that the draft was shared with the executive and officials. A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph also wanted the CBI to indicate on what basis an assertive statement was made at the March 12 hearing, through its counsel, Additional Solicitor General [Harin Raval], that the "report had not been shared with anyone and it was meant for the court alone." Senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for the CBI, submitted to the court in a sealed cover the draft status report (DSR) and the final report in which changes were made. Though the Bench accepted the report, it wanted the CBI Director to file an affidavit so that the contents could be made known to all. The other posers made by the Bench to the CBI are: The affidavit now filed on April 26 having candidly stated the DSR was shared with the Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission to the court and also with a Joint Secretary in the Coal Ministry and an official in the PMO, why haven't the details been given? Were changes made or not in the DSR and, if yes, the extent of changes made and at whose instance these were made and whether, besides the three mentioned in the affidavit, the draft report was shared with any person? The court wants to know the names of the officials referred to by the CBI, in its April 26 affidavit, with whom the DSR was shared; the procedure being followed by the CBI under the manual/ guidelines in sharing the status reports on the ongoing investigation called for by the court; the details of the investigation team and CVs of the DIGs and Superintendents of Police handling the investigation in the coal allocation case. The Bench made it clear that the entire information to be furnished must be candid, truthful and founded on records. Justice Lodha told Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati.